Literature DB >> 13678092

Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Jeffrey Johnson, Hans Roehrig, Michael Engstrom, Jiahua Fan, John Nafziger, Jeffrey Lubin, William J Dallas.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The investigators developed an efficient method for optimizing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor performance for digital mammography, based on the correlation between the performance of human observers and the performance of a mathematical computer model of the human visual system. The investigators examined observer performance on soft-copy display of mammographic images that were either unprocessed or processed to compensate for modulation transfer function (MTF) deficiencies in the CRT display. The results were used to validate the human visual system model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six radiologists viewed a series of 250 mammographic images with microcalcification clusters with different contrast levels on a CRT monitor. The images were viewed twice: once without image processing and once with processing designed to compensate for MTF deficiencies in the CRT monitor. The images were analyzed with the JNDmetrix Visual Discrimination Model, which is based on the principles of just-noticeable difference measurement and frequency-channel vision modeling. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for the human observers and compared statistically with the model observers' performance.
RESULTS: Both human and model performance was better overall with the MTF-compensated images, especially for microcalcifications in the midlevel contrast range. There was a very high correlation between human and model observers.
CONCLUSION: The use of image-processing methods to compensate for limitations in the MTF of CRT monitors can improve the detection performance of radiologists searching for microcalcifications in mammographic images, and a model based on characteristics of the human visual system can be used to predict human observer results accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13678092     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00293-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  7 in total

1.  Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jeffrey Johnson; Hans Roehrig; John Nafziger; Jiahua Fan; Jeffery Lubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Hans Roehrig; William Dallas; Jiahua Fan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Continuing challenges in defining image quality.

Authors:  Narendra Shet; Joseph Chen; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-14

4.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Medical display application for degraded image sharpness restoration based on the modulation transfer function: initial assessment for a five-megapixel mammography display monitor.

Authors:  Shogo Tokurei; Yoichiro Ikushima; Kazuki Takegami; Munemasa Okada; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  An alternate method for using a visual discrimination model (VDM) to optimize soft-copy display image quality.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.