Literature DB >> 15650302

Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.

D Cafarelli Dees1, N Dillier, W K Lai, E von Wallenberg, B van Dijk, F Akdas, M Aksit, C Batman, A Beynon, S Burdo, J-M Chanal, L Collet, M Conway, C Coudert, L Craddock, H Cullington, N Deggouj, B Fraysse, S Grabel, J Kiefer, J G Kiss, T Lenarz, A Mair, S Maune, J Müller-Deile, J-P Piron, S Razza, C Tasche, H Thai-Van, F Toth, E Truy, A Uziel, G F Smoorenburg.   

Abstract

One hundred and forty-seven adult recipients of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system, from 13 different European countries, were tested using neural response telemetry to measure the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), according to a standardised postoperative measurement procedure. Recordings were obtained in 96% of these subjects with this standardised procedure. The group results are presented in terms of peak amplitude and latency, slope of the amplitude growth function and ECAP threshold. The effects of aetiological factors and the duration of deafness on the ECAP were also studied. While large intersubject variability and intrasubject variability (across electrodes) were found, results fell within a consistent pattern and a normative range of peak amplitudes and latencies was established. The aetiological factors had little effect on the ECAP characteristics. However, age affected ECAP amplitude and slope of the amplitude growth function significantly; i.e., the amplitude is higher in the lowest age category (15-30 years). Principal component analysis of the ECAP thresholds shows that the thresholds across 5 electrodes can be described by two factors accounting for 92% of the total variance. The two factors represent the overall level of the threshold profiles ('shift') and their slopes across the electrode array ('tilt'). Correlation between these two factors and the same factors describing the T- and C-levels appeared to be moderate, in the range of 0.5-0.6. 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650302     DOI: 10.1159/000083366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

3.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

4.  Neural response telemetry in patients with the double-array cochlear implant.

Authors:  Maria Valéria Goffi-Gomez; Carolina F Abdala; Cristina Gomes Ornelas Peralta; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Rubens Vuono de Brito Neto; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory neuropathy in systemic sclerosis: a speech perception and evoked potential study before and after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rosamaria Santarelli; Pietro Scimemi; Erica Dal Monte; Elisabetta Genovese; Edoardo Arslan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  TNRT profiles with the nucleus research platform 8 system.

Authors:  W K Lai; N Dillier; B P Weber; T Lenarz; R Battmer; B Gantz; C Brown; N Cohen; S Waltzman; M Skinner; L Holden; R Cowan; P Busby; M Killian
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.