Literature DB >> 25445817

Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.

Paul J Abbas1, Carolyn J Brown2.   

Abstract

This paper reviews characteristics of both the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and analogous measures of cortically evoked responses (CAEP) to electrical stimulation in cochlear implant users. Specific comparisons are made between the two levels of processing for measures of threshold, growth of responses with increasing stimulus level, changes in stimulation electrode and, finally, in temporal response properties. The results are interpreted in a context that ECAPs primarily reflect the characteristics of the electrode-neural interface for an individual ear. CAEPs clearly are dependent on those peripheral responses but also reflect differences in central processing among individual implant users. The potential applicability of combined measures in clinical situations is discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Lasker Award>.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445817      PMCID: PMC4380632          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  76 in total

1.  Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.

Authors:  M L Hughes; C J Brown; P J Abbas; A A Wolaver; J P Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults.

Authors:  C J Brown; M L Hughes; B Luk; P J Abbas; A Wolaver; J Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system.

Authors:  Norbert Dillier; Wai Kong Lai; Bengt Almqvist; Carolin Frohne; Joachim Müller-Deile; Matthias Stecker; Ernst von Wallenberg
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.

Authors:  Feddo B van der Beek; Jeroen J Briaire; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  M P Gorga; J R Kaminski; K A Beauchaine; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1988-03

6.  Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei.

Authors:  D B Webster; M Webster
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-07

7.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus: effects of neonatal unilateral cochlear ablation.

Authors:  L M Kitzes; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  13 in total

1.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

2.  Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; Tracy Wilkinson; Lauren Wilson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Compound Action Potential in Subjects Receiving a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  William C Scott; Christopher K Giardina; Andrew K Pappa; Tatyana E Fontenot; Meredith L Anderson; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Tyler C McFayden; Haibo Wang; Katherine E Gill; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; Jianfen Luo; Ruijie Wang; Nancy He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Auditory synaptopathy, auditory neuropathy, and cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Aiden Eliot Shearer; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Dyan Ramekers; Deborah J Colesa; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chun Liang; Lisa H Wenstrup; Ravi N Samy; Jing Xiang; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Mimic Cochlear Implant Surgery-Induced Cochlear Infection Fails to Further Damage Auditory Pathway in Deafened Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Zhao Han; Chengjin Wang; Yuyan Gu; Ning Cong; Rui Ma; Fanglu Chi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.