Literature DB >> 17709572

Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Lucas H M Mens1.   

Abstract

During the last decade, cochlear implantation has evolved into a well-established treatment of deafness, predominantly because of many improvements in speech processing and the controlled excitation of the auditory nerve. Cochlear implants now also feature telemetry, which is highly useful to monitor the proper functioning of the implanted electronics and electrode contacts. Telemetry can also support the clinical management in young children and difficult cases where neural unresponsiveness is suspected. This article will review recent advances in the telemetry of the electrically evoked compound action potential that have made these measurements simple and routine procedures in most cases. The distribution of the electrical stimulus itself sampled by "electrical field imaging" reveals general patterns of current flow in the normal cochlea and gross abnormalities in individual patients; models have been developed to derive more subtle insights from an individual electrical field imaging. Finally, some thoughts are given to the extended application of telemetry, for example, in monitoring the neural responses or in combination with other treatments of the deaf ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709572      PMCID: PMC4111364          DOI: 10.1177/1084713807304362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  50 in total

1.  Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children.

Authors:  M L Hughes; C J Brown; P J Abbas; A A Wolaver; J P Gervais
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  A new method for dealing with the stimulus artefact in electrically evoked compound action potential measurements.

Authors:  W Martin C Klop; Aran Hartlooper; Jeroen J Briare; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.

Authors:  Steve Mason
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Objective measurements of auditory nerve recovery function in nucleus CI 24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate.

Authors:  Thalma Shpak; Mira Berlin; Michal Luntz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Bas van Dijk; Matthijs Killian
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Intracochlear potential distribution with intracochlear and extracochlear electrical stimulation in humans.

Authors:  A Kasper; M Pelizzone; P Montandon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Quadrupolar stimulation for Cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data.

Authors:  C N Jolly; F A Spelman; B M Clopton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation.

Authors:  M F Suesserman; F A Spelman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  The cochlear implant program: an overview.

Authors:  K I Berliner; W F House
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr

10.  Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential.

Authors:  B J Gantz; C J Brown; P J Abbas
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-03
View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Rachel Scheperle; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  Insertion Guidance Based on Impedance Measurements of a Cochlear Electrode Array.

Authors:  Enver Salkim; Majid Zamani; Dai Jiang; Shakeel R Saeed; Andreas Demosthenous
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.387

6.  Impedance Measures During in vitro Cochlear Implantation Predict Array Positioning.

Authors:  Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Elliot Samuel Krause; Kanthaiah Koka; Douglas Carl Fitzpatrick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  An Instrumented Cochlea Model for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulus Spread.

Authors:  Chen Jiang; Shreya Singhal; Thomas Landry; Iwan Roberts; Simone de Rijk; Tim Brochier; Tobias Goehring; Yu Tam; Robert Carlyon; George Malliaras; Manohar Bance
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  The Estimated Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Listeners Is Different for Early-Implanted Children and Late-Implanted Adults.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Gabrielle O'Brien; Steven M Bierer; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-25

9.  Input-Output Functions in Human Heads Obtained With Cochlear Implant and Transcranial Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Phillip Tran; Matthew L Richardson; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 10.  Sensitive and critical periods in visual sensory deprivation.

Authors:  Patrice Voss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.