Literature DB >> 15580316

A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy.

S Adamsen1, P M Funch-Jensen, A M Drewes, J Rosenberg, T P Grantcharov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to investigate whether there is a correlation between manual skills in laparoscopic procedures and manual skills in flexible endoscopy.
METHODS: In a prospective study using laparoscopy and endoscopy simulators (MIST-VR, and GI-Mentor II), 24 consecutive subjects (gastrointestinal surgeons, novice and experienced gastroenterologists, and untrained subjects) were asked to perform laparoscopic and endoscopic tasks. Their performance was assessed by the simulators' software and by observers blinded to the levels of subjects' experience. Performance in experienced vs inexperienced subjects was compared. Score pairs of three parameters--time, errors, and economy of movement--were also compared.
RESULTS: Experienced subjects performed significantly better than inexperienced subjects on both tasks in terms of time, errors, and economy of movement (p < 0.05). All three performance parameters in laparoscopy and endoscopy correlated significantly (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Both simulators can distinguish between experienced and inexperienced subjects. Observed skills in simulated laparoscopy correlate with skills in simulated flexible endoscopy. This finding may have an impact on the design of training programs involving both procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580316     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9090-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Simulators and gastrointestinal endoscopy training.

Authors:  S Adamsen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  A score card for upper GI endoscopy: Evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience.

Authors:  M Neumann; S Friedl; A Meining; K Egger; W Heldwein; J F Rey; J Hochberger; M Classen; W Hohenberger; T Rösch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquistion of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator.

Authors:  James D Watterson; Darren T Beiko; James K Kuan; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A learning curve for laparoscopic fundoplication. Definable, avoidable, or a waste of time?

Authors:  D I Watson; R J Baigrie; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  P S Jowell; J Baillie; M S Branch; J Affronti; C L Browning; B P Bute
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A new endoscopic simulator.

Authors:  S Bar-Meir
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  10 in total

1.  Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Pepa A Kaneva; Benjamin K Poulose; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Riadh Sadik; Gideon Sroka; Mehran Anvari; Klaus Thaler; Gina L Adrales; Jeffrey W Hazey; Jenifer R Lightdale; Vic Velanovich; Lee L Swanstrom; John D Mellinger; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Shohei Yamaguchi; Kozo Konishi; Takefumi Yasunaga; Daisuke Yoshida; Nao Kinjo; Kiichiro Kobayashi; Satoshi Ieiri; Ken Okazaki; Hideaki Nakashima; Kazuo Tanoue; Yoshihiko Maehara; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Objective assessment of visuospatial and psychomotor ability and flow of residents and senior endoscopists in simulated gastroscopy.

Authors:  L Enochsson; B Westman; E M Ritter; L Hedman; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan Pearl; Erika Fellinger; Brian Dunkin; Eric Pauli; Thadeus Trus; Jeffrey Marks; Robert Fanelli; Michael Meara; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Expert benchmark for the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  Roy Phitayakorn; Jeffrey M Marks; Harry L Reynolds; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Do basic psychomotor skills transfer between different image-based procedures?

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Richard H M Goossens; Erik J Schoon; Huib de Ridder; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Resident Endoscopy Experience Correlates Poorly with Performance on a Virtual Reality Simulator.

Authors:  Kurun Partap S Oberoi; Michael T Scott; Jacob Schwartzman; Jasmine Mahajan; Nell Maloney Patel; Melissa M Alvarez-Downing; Aziz M Merchant; Anastasia Kunac
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-03-03

9.  Correlation of surgical trainee performance on laparoscopic versus endoscopic simulation.

Authors:  Jennifer Koichopolos; Jeffrey Hawel; Eran Shlomovitz; Ilay Habaz; Ahmad Elnahas; Nawar A Alkhamesi; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez-Lopez; Marcelo Fabián Maina; Francesc Saigí-Rubió
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.