Literature DB >> 15067632

Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.

Robert E Sedlack1, Joseph C Kolars, Jeffrey A Alexander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Computer-based endoscopy simulator (CBES) training's impact on patient-based outcomes has never been examined. This study examines whether the endoscopy skills of trainees are improved and patient discomfort is reduced as a result of CBES training.
METHODS: From July 2001-June 2002, 38 residents received either 1 week of patient-based training (PBT) alone in flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or 3 hours of simulator-based training (SBT) before a week of training in FS. Patients completed questionnaires grading the discomfort experienced during endoscopy (1, no pain; 10, worst pain of life). In addition, residents' performance was graded by the supervising staff and themselves with 8 performance parameters by using a 1-10 Likert scale (1, strongly agree; 5, neutral; 10, strongly disagree).
RESULTS: Nineteen SBT and 19 PBT residents performed 150 and 175 FS, respectively. During this same period, staff completed 585 FS. The median patient discomfort score for SBT residents was significantly less than for PBT residents, 3 (25%-75% interquartile range [IQR], 2-5) vs. 4 (IQR, 2-6) (P < 0.01). Discomfort scores for both resident groups were significantly greater than those recorded by staff endoscopists, 2 (IQR, 1-4) (P < 0.01). No difference was seen in the residents' procedural skill scores. Resident self-evaluation scores were significantly greater than those received from the supervising staff.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased patient comfort resulted from simulation training, demonstrating that CBES training has a direct benefit to the patient. Although no measurable impact on residents' performance skills was observed, we do demonstrate that residents perceive themselves as having acquired greater endoscopic skills in contrast to staff evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15067632     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  28 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of validity testing in colonoscopy simulation.

Authors:  James Ansell; John Mason; Neil Warren; Peter Donnelly; Neil Hawkes; Sunil Dolwani; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: live and simulated.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Tark Albrani; Atiquaz Zaman; Isis Kumar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy.

Authors:  S Adamsen; P M Funch-Jensen; A M Drewes; J Rosenberg; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Visuospatial abilities correlate with performance of senior endoscopy specialist in simulated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bo Westman; E Matt Ritter; Ann Kjellin; Leif Törkvist; Torsten Wredmark; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The perception of gastroenterology fellows towards the relationship between hand size and endoscopic training.

Authors:  Daniel L Cohen; Jahnavi R Naik; Leonardo J Tamariz; Ryan D Madanick
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  S N Buzink; A D Koch; J Heemskerk; S M B I Botden; R H M Goossens; H de Ridder; E J Schoon; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of a novel method of teaching endobronchial ultrasound: physician- versus respiratory therapist-proctored simulation training.

Authors:  David Ryan Stather; Alex Chee; Paul Maceachern; Elaine Dumoulin; Christopher A Hergott; Jacob Gelberg; Sandra D Scott; Sylvia De Guzman; Alain Tremblay
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.409

9.  Virtual reality simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy training.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Lazaros Dimitrios Lazaridis; George D Dimitriadis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-01-16

Review 10.  Role of simulation in training the next generation of endoscopists.

Authors:  Simon C Blackburn; Stephen J Griffin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.