Literature DB >> 8967710

Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

P S Jowell1, J Baillie, M S Branch, J Affronti, C L Browning, B P Bute.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University training program for gastroenterologists. PARTICIPANTS: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training. MEASURES: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP.
RESULTS: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81%). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs.
CONCLUSIONS: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8967710     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-12-199612150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  57 in total

Review 1.  Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; E Morris; D Forman; A Eastwood
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

2.  Guidelines for training in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ECRP). Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluating the feasibility of direct peroral cholangioscopy training with an endoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Lin; Chih-Jen Chen; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Chien-Yuan Hung; Ming-Jen Chen; Horng-Yuan Wang; Shou-Chuan Shih; Chia-Yuan Liu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.

Authors:  K Ragunath; L A Thomas; W Y Cheung; P D Duane; D G Richards
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis provides an objective measure of competency during training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  Hayley M Waller; Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy.

Authors:  S Adamsen; P M Funch-Jensen; A M Drewes; J Rosenberg; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP.

Authors:  Lance T Uradomo; Mark E Lustberg; Peter E Darwin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic privileges: an overview.

Authors:  D Armstrong; R Enns; T Ponich; J Romagnuolo; J Springer; A N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 9.  Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP?

Authors:  John Baillie; Pier-Alberto Testoni
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  200 supervised procedures: the minimum threshold number for competency in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J García-Cano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.