Literature DB >> 26233066

Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.

Angela Yarnell Bonino1, Lori J Leibold1.   

Abstract

This study examined the benefit of a pretrial cue, a preview of the signal, on children's (5-10 years) and adults' detection of a 1000-Hz pure-tone signal in a broadband noise or a random-frequency, two-tone masker. No cuing effect was observed with the noise masker, regardless of listener age. In contrast, all but one adult benefited from the cue with the two-tone masker (average = 9.4 dB). Most children showed no cuing effect (average = 0.1 dB) with the two-tone masker. These results suggest that, unlike adults, the provision of a pretrial cue does not promote frequency-selective listening during detection for 5- to 10-year-olds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233066      PMCID: PMC4499049          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Informational masking with small set sizes.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Zhongzhou Tang; Gerald D Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Note on informational masking.

Authors:  Nathaniel I Durlach; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Tanya L Arbogast; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Rong Huang; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Attending to auditory filters that were not stimulated directly.

Authors:  E R Hafter; R S Schlauch; J Tang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking by a remote-frequency noise band in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Donna L Neff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

Authors:  L A Werner; J Y Bargones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-11

9.  One factor underlies individual differences in auditory informational masking within and across age groups.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Doris J Kistler; Eunmi L Oh; Frederic L Wightman; Michael R Callahan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-04

10.  Effects of masker-spectral variability and masker fringes in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.