Literature DB >> 15508164

Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging.

Mark A Griswold1, Stephan Kannengiesser, Robin M Heidemann, Jianmin Wang, Peter M Jakob.   

Abstract

Parallel imaging is one of the most promising developments in recent years for the acceleration of MR acquisitions. One area of practical importance where different parallel imaging methods perform differently is the manner in which they deal with aliasing in the full-FOV reconstructed image. It has been reported that sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reconstruction fails whenever the reconstructed FOV is smaller than the object being imaged. On the other hand, generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) has been used successfully to reconstruct images with aliasing in the reconstructed FOV, as in conventional imaging. The disparate behavior of these methods can be easily demonstrated by a few simple illustrative examples. Additional in vivo examples using GRAPPA and modified SENSE (mSENSE) make this distinction clear. These experiments demonstrate that SENSE fails to reconstruct correct images when coil sensitivity maps are used that do not automatically account for the object size and therefore the aliasing in the reconstructed images. However, with the use of aliased high-resolution coil sensitivity maps, accurate SENSE reconstructions can be generated. On the other hand, GRAPPA produces images with an aliasing appearance that is exactly as would be expected from normal nonaccelerated acquisitions. An understanding of these effects could potentially lead to fewer operator-dependent errors, as well as a better understanding of the differences between the underlying reconstruction processes. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15508164     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  29 in total

1.  Coil compression for accelerated imaging with Cartesian sampling.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Comparison of volume, four- and eight-channel head coils using standard and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Elke R Gizewski; Stefan Maderwald; Isabel Wanke; Susanne Goehde; Michael Forsting; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Continuously moving table MRI with SENSE: application in peripheral contrast enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; David G Kruger; James F Glockner; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Thomas A Hope; Murat Aksoy; Marcus T Alley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  MRA of abdominal vessels: technical advances.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Olaf Dietrich; Kambiz Nael; Sabine Weckbach; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Calvin D Lew; Marcus T Alley; Roland Bammer; Daniel M Spielman; Frandics P Chan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Y A Bhagat; D J Emery; S Naik; T Yeo; C Beaulieu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Clinical multishot DW-EPI through parallel imaging with considerations of susceptibility, motion, and noise.

Authors:  Stefan Skare; Rexford D Newbould; David B Clayton; Gregory W Albers; Scott Nagle; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  SSFP and GRE phase contrast imaging using a three-echo readout.

Authors:  Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Image reconstruction in k-space from MR data encoded with ambiguous gradient fields.

Authors:  Gerrit Schultz; Daniel Gallichan; Hans Weber; Walter R T Witschey; Matthias Honal; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.