BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) of the brain is usually acquired with single-shot echo-planar imaging, which is associated with localized signal loss, geometric distortions, and blurring. Parallel imaging can lessen these artifacts by shortening the length of the echo-train acquisition. The self-calibrating parallel acquisition techniques, image domain-based modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) and k-space-based generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), were evaluated with DTI of the brain in 5 healthy subjects. METHODS: GRAPPA and mSENSE with higher acceleration factors (R) up to 4 were compared with conventional DTI (with and without phase partial Fourier, another method of reducing the echo-train length) on a 1.5T Sonata scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The resulting images and diffusion maps were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative analysis was performed by 3 reviewers blinded to the technique using image sharpness and the level of artifacts as characteristics for scoring each set of images. Quantitative comparisons encompassed measuring signal-to-noise ratio, Trace/3 apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) in 6 white-matter (WM) and gray-matter (GM) regions. RESULTS: Reviewers scored the GRAPPA and mSENSE R = 2 images better than images acquired with conventional techniques. FA contrast was improved at the GM/WM junction in peripheral brain areas. Trace/3 ADC and FA measurements were consistent for all methods. However, R = 3,4 images suffered from reconstruction-related artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: GRAPPA and mSENSE (R = 2) minimized the susceptibility and off-resonance effects associated with conventional DTI methods, yielding high-quality images and reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) of the brain is usually acquired with single-shot echo-planar imaging, which is associated with localized signal loss, geometric distortions, and blurring. Parallel imaging can lessen these artifacts by shortening the length of the echo-train acquisition. The self-calibrating parallel acquisition techniques, image domain-based modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) and k-space-based generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), were evaluated with DTI of the brain in 5 healthy subjects. METHODS: GRAPPA and mSENSE with higher acceleration factors (R) up to 4 were compared with conventional DTI (with and without phase partial Fourier, another method of reducing the echo-train length) on a 1.5T Sonata scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The resulting images and diffusion maps were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative analysis was performed by 3 reviewers blinded to the technique using image sharpness and the level of artifacts as characteristics for scoring each set of images. Quantitative comparisons encompassed measuring signal-to-noise ratio, Trace/3 apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fractional anisotropy (FA) in 6 white-matter (WM) and gray-matter (GM) regions. RESULTS: Reviewers scored the GRAPPA and mSENSE R = 2 images better than images acquired with conventional techniques. FA contrast was improved at the GM/WM junction in peripheral brain areas. Trace/3 ADC and FA measurements were consistent for all methods. However, R = 3,4 images suffered from reconstruction-related artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: GRAPPA and mSENSE (R = 2) minimized the susceptibility and off-resonance effects associated with conventional DTI methods, yielding high-quality images and reproducible quantitative diffusion measurements.
Authors: R Bammer; S L Keeling; M Augustin; K P Pruessmann; R Wolf; R Stollberger; H P Hartung; F Fazekas Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: T Jaermann; G Crelier; K P Pruessmann; X Golay; T Netsch; A M C van Muiswinkel; S Mori; P C M van Zijl; A Valavanis; S Kollias; P Boesiger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Florian M Vogt; Gerald Antoch; Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Bernd J Wintersperger; Olaf Dietrich; Titus Lanz; Andreas Greiser; Maximilian F Reiser; Gary M Glazer; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Stephan Kannengiesser; Robin M Heidemann; Jianmin Wang; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Winfried A Willinek; Jürgen Gieseke; Marcus von Falkenhausen; Barbara Neuen; Hans H Schild; Christiane K Kuhl Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-07-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Deepu R Pillai; Robin M Heidemann; Praveen Kumar; Nagesh Shanbhag; Titus Lanz; Michael S Dittmar; Beatrice Sandner; Christoph P Beier; Norbert Weidner; Mark W Greenlee; Gerhard Schuierer; Ulrich Bogdahn; Felix Schlachetzki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J Ding; Y Duan; Z Zhuo; Y Yuan; G Zhang; Q Song; B Gao; B Zhang; M Wang; L Yang; Y Hou; J Yuan; C Feng; J Wang; L Lin; Y Liu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Donghyun Kim; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Gi Won Shin; Sung-Chul Jin; Hye Jin Baek; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Kang Soo Kim; InSeong Kim Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2021-01-18