Literature DB >> 17307658

Peak velocity and flow quantification validation for sensitivity-encoded phase-contrast MR imaging.

Calvin D Lew1, Marcus T Alley, Roland Bammer, Daniel M Spielman, Frandics P Chan.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique has important clinical applications in blood flow quantification and pressure gradient estimation by velocity measurement. Parallel imaging using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) may substantially reduce scan time. We demonstrate the utility of PC-MRI measurements accelerated by SENSE under clinical conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accuracy and repeatability of a SENSE-PC implementation was evaluated by comparison with a commercial PC sequence with five normal volunteers. Twenty-six patients were then scanned with SENSE-PC at reduction factors (R = 1, 2, and 3). Blood flow and peak velocity were measured in the aorta and pulmonary trunk in 16 patients and peak velocity was measured at the coarctation of 10 patients. Quantitative flow, shunt ratio, and peak velocity measurements obtained with different reduction factors were compared using correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman statistics. All studies were approved by an Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was acquired from all subjects.
RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for all comparisons were >0.962 and with high statistical significance (P < .01). Linear regression slopes ranged between 0.96 and 1.11 for flow and 0.88 to 1.05 for peak velocity. For flow, the Bland-Altman statistics yielded a total mean difference ranging from -0.02 to 0.05) L/minute with 2 standard of deviation limits ranging from -0.52 to 0.75 L/minute. For peak velocity, the total mean difference ranged from -0.10 to -0.004) milliseconds with 2-SD limits ranging from -0.062 to 0.46 milliseconds. R = 3 to R = 1 comparisons had greater 2-SD limits than R = 2 to R = 1 comparisons.
CONCLUSION: SENSE PC-MRI measurements for flow and pressure gradient estimation were comparable to conventional PC-MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17307658      PMCID: PMC1993829          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  20 in total

1.  Phase-velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging measurement of pulsatile blood flow in children and young adults: in vitro and in vivo validation.

Authors:  A J Powell; S E Maier; T Chung; T Geva
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Accuracy and reproducibility in phase contrast imaging using SENSE.

Authors:  Per Thunberg; Matts Karlsson; Lars Wigström
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Signal-to-noise in phase angle reconstruction: dynamic range extension using phase reference offsets.

Authors:  T E Conturo; G D Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance.

Authors:  G L Nayler; D N Firmin; D B Longmore
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Morphological evaluation of atrioventricular septal defects by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J M Parsons; E J Baker; R H Anderson; E J Ladusans; A Hayes; S A Qureshi; P B Deverall; N Fagg; A Cook; M N Maisey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

8.  Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry.

Authors:  P Beerbaum; H Körperich; P Barth; H Esdorn; J Gieseke; H Meyer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Rapid left-to-right shunt quantification in children by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging combined with sensitivity encoding (SENSE).

Authors:  Philipp Beerbaum; Hermann Körperich; Jürgen Gieseke; Peter Barth; Matthias Peuster; Hans Meyer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-08-25       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study.

Authors:  Hermann Körperich; Jürgen Gieseke; Peter Barth; Romhild Hoogeveen; Hermann Esdorn; Andreas Peterschröder; Hans Meyer; Philipp Beerbaum
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Christian Kremser; Johannes P Schwaiger; Martin Reindl; Johannes Mair; Silvana Müller; Agnes Mayr; Wolfgang-Michael Franz; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Improved cardiovascular flow quantification with time-resolved volumetric phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Albert Hsiao; Marcus T Alley; Payam Massaband; Robert J Herfkens; Frandics P Chan; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11

3.  Aortopulmonary collateral flow in cystic fibrosis assessed with phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Robert Fleck; Gary McPhail; Rhonda Szczesniak; Joshua Knowlton; Rupa Radhakrishnan; John Clancy; Raouf Amin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-16

4.  Mean volume flow estimation in pulsatile flow conditions.

Authors:  Michael S Richards; Oliver D Kripfgans; Jonathan M Rubin; Anne L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Consensus-Based Technical Recommendations for Clinical Translation of Renal Phase Contrast MRI.

Authors:  Anneloes de Boer; Giulia Villa; Octavia Bane; Michael Bock; Eleanor F Cox; Ilona A Dekkers; Per Eckerbom; Maria A Fernández-Seara; Susan T Francis; Bryan Haddock; Michael E Hall; Pauline Hall Barrientos; Ingo Hermann; Paul D Hockings; Hildo J Lamb; Christoffer Laustsen; Ruth P Lim; David M Morris; Steffen Ringgaard; Suraj D Serai; Kanishka Sharma; Steven Sourbron; Yasuo Takehara; Andrew L Wentland; Marcos Wolf; Frank G Zöllner; Fabio Nery; Anna Caroli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.119

6.  Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary outflow tract obstruction: A comparative study of cardiovascular phase contrast magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography versus cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Michael Steinmetz; Andreas Schuster; Christina Unterberg-Buchwald; Thuy-Trang Nguyen; Martin Fasshauer; Wieland Staab; Olga Hösch; Christina Rosenberg; Thomas Paul; Joachim Lotz; Jan Martin Sohns
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-11-04

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.