Literature DB >> 19447765

Two ears and two (or more?) devices: a pediatric case study of bilateral profound hearing loss.

Rosalie M Uchanski1, Lisa S Davidson, Sharon Quadrizius, Ruth Reeder, Jamie Cadieux, Jerrica Kettel, Richard A Chole.   

Abstract

Advances in technology and expanding candidacy guidelines have motivated many clinics to consider children with precipitously sloping high-frequency hearing loss as candidates for cochlear implants (CIs). A case study is presented of a pediatric CI patient whose hearing thresholds were preserved within 10 dB of preimplant levels (125-750 Hz) after receiving a fully inserted 31.5-mm electrode array at one ear. The primary goal of this study was to explore the possible benefit of using both a hearing aid (HA) and a CI at one ear while using a HA at the opposite ear. The authors find that although the use of bilateral hearing aids with a CI may only provide a slight benefit, careful attention must be paid to the coordinated fitting of devices, especially at the ear with two devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19447765      PMCID: PMC4111527          DOI: 10.1177/1084713809336423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  45 in total

1.  Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Janice E Chang; John Y Bai; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Chris J James; Bernard Fraysse; Olivier Deguine; Thomas Lenarz; Deborah Mawman; Angel Ramos; Richard Ramsden; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Do cross-modal projections always result in multisensory integration?

Authors:  Brian L Allman; Ruben E Bittencourt-Navarrete; Leslie P Keniston; Alexandre E Medina; Meng Y Wang; M Alex Meredith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Cochlear implants and hearing aids: some personal and professional reflections.

Authors:  Mark Ross
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing.

Authors:  Wai Na Yao; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Michael Jackson; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Susan B Waltzman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  The importance of high-frequency audibility in the speech and language development of children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Andrea L Pittman; Brenda M Hoover; Dawna E Lewis; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

9.  Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Optimizing the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Paul J Abbas; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ryan F Brown; Timothy E Hullar; Jamie H Cadieux; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The effects of bilateral electric and bimodal electric--acoustic stimulation on language development.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Christopher Chapman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-08-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.