Literature DB >> 15475330

Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird.

Tommaso Pizzari1, Hanne Løvlie, Charles K Cornwallis.   

Abstract

Inbreeding often depresses offspring fitness. Because females invest more than males in a reproductive event, inbreeding is expected to be more costly to mothers than fathers, creating a divergence between the reproductive interests of each sex and promoting sex-specific inbreeding strategies. Males and females may bias the probability of inbreeding by selecting copulation partners, and, in sexually promiscuous species, through male strategic sperm investment in different females and female selection of the sperm of different males. However, these processes are often difficult to study, and the way that different male and female strategies interact to determine inbreeding remains poorly understood. Here we demonstrate sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in the promiscuous red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. First, a male was just as likely to copulate with his full-sib sister as with an unrelated female. In addition, males displayed a tendency to: (i) initiate copulation faster when exposed to an unrelated female than when exposed to a sister, and (ii) inseminate more sperm into sisters than into unrelated females. Second, females retained fewer sperm following insemination by brothers, thus reducing the risk of inbreeding and counteracting male inbreeding strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475330      PMCID: PMC1691842          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  David P Froman; Tommaso Pizzari; Allen J Feltmann; Hector Castillo-Juarez; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fecundity and MHC affects ejaculation tactics and paternity bias in sand lizards.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Thomas Madsen; Beata Ujvari; Erik Wapstra
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The interaction of avian spermatozoa with the perivitelline layer in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M G Steele; W Meldrum; J P Brillard; G J Wishart
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1994-08

6.  No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  An in situ hybridization study of the effects of artificial insemination on the localization of cells expressing MHC class II mRNA in the chicken oviduct.

Authors:  W M Zheng; M Nishibori; N Isobe; Y Yoshimura
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Quantitative aspects of sperm:egg interaction in chickens and turkeys.

Authors:  G J Wishart
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.145

9.  Possible roles for products of polymorphic MHC and linked olfactory receptor genes during selection processes in reproduction.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Gotrfried Dohr; Barbara Uchanska-Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

Authors:  S Meagher; D J Penn; W K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Tomas Albrecht; Mark Liu; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Melissa L Thomas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Cryptic female preference for genetically unrelated males is mediated by ovarian fluid in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Sperm success and immunity.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Susan S Suarez; Brian P Lazzaro; Tommaso Pizzari; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Male-female relatedness and patterns of male reproductive investment in guppies.

Authors:  Luisa J Fitzpatrick; Clelia Gasparini; John L Fitzpatrick; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Sex-specific population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in a wild bird population as revealed by genome-wide microsatellite analyses.

Authors:  Meng-Hua Li; Juha Merilä
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): mate choice and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.