Literature DB >> 9412735

Quantitative aspects of sperm:egg interaction in chickens and turkeys.

G J Wishart1.   

Abstract

Spermatozoa embedded in the outer perivitelline layer and points of hydrolysis (holes) produced by spermatozoa in the inner perivitelline layer of chicken and turkey eggs were found to be evenly distributed and linearly correlated (r = 0.80 for both species) throughout the layers from most regions of the egg, except from those directly over the germinal disc, in which there were more holes. In turkey eggs there appeared to be relatively fewer perivitelline spermatozoa, since many had degenerated beyond recognition. In eggs from both species, there were approximately 25 times more holes mm-2 in the inner perivitelline layer from over the germinal disc region than that from other regions of the egg. The relationship between these two frequencies could also be described as linear (r = 0.81 for chicken and 0.78 for turkey eggs), although there was some evidence for a saturation effect for holes over the germinal disc. The fertile status of eggs was shown to be a function of all of the above parameters. Eggs from both species had a 50% probability of being fertile when around 3 spermatozoa penetrated the inner perivitelline layer over the germinal disc and showed maximum fertility when more than 6 spermatozoa penetrated this region. Spermatozoa in the outer perivitelline layer and holes in the inner perivitelline layer from regions other than over the germinal disc could also be used to predict fertility, although with less certainty. Since the number of spermatozoa interacting with the egg reflects the numbers of those stored in the uterovaginal sperm storage tubules, the relationships derived in this work should be useful for understanding how fertility in chickens and turkeys is a function of oviducal sperm storage and transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9412735     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(97)00042-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci        ISSN: 0378-4320            Impact factor:   2.145


  8 in total

1.  Generation of gene edited birds in one generation using sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE).

Authors:  Caitlin A Cooper; Arjun Challagulla; Kristie A Jenkins; Terry G Wise; Terri E O'Neil; Kirsten R Morris; Mark L Tizard; Timothy J Doran
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Quantitative Protein Analysis of ZPB2, ZPB1 and ZPC in the Germinal Disc and a Non-Germinal Disc Region of the Inner Perivitelline Layer in Two Genetic Lines of Turkey Hens That Differ in Fertility.

Authors:  Andrew Benson; Josh Steed; Mia Malloy; Adam J Davis
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Hanne Løvlie; Charles K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Polyspermy in birds: sperm numbers and embryo survival.

Authors:  N Hemmings; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Dietary supplementation with canthaxanthin and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on the incubation performance and fertility of European quail breeders.

Authors:  L P Bonagurio; A E Murakami; F K Cruz; I N Kaneko; E Gasparino; C A L Oliveira; C A Lozano-Poveda; C C Silva; T C Santos
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Cleavage events and sperm dynamics in chick intrauterine embryos.

Authors:  Hyung Chul Lee; Hee Jung Choi; Tae Sub Park; Sang In Lee; Young Min Kim; Deivendran Rengaraj; Hiroki Nagai; Guojun Sheng; Jeong Mook Lim; Jae Yong Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Detection of oocyte perivitelline membrane-bound sperm: a tool for avian collection management.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Croyle; Barbara S Durrant; Thomas Jensen
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Investigation of the Guinea fowl and domestic fowl hybrids as potential surrogate hosts for avian cryopreservation programmes.

Authors:  Mariann Molnár; Bence Lázár; Nikoletta Sztán; Barbara Végi; Árpád Drobnyák; Roland Tóth; Krisztina Liptói; Miklós Marosán; Elen Gócza; Sunil Nandi; Michael J McGrew; Eszter Patakiné Várkonyi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.