Literature DB >> 10716731

Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

S Meagher1, D J Penn, W K Potts.   

Abstract

The detrimental effects of inbreeding on vertebrates are well documented for early stages of the life cycle in the laboratory. However, the consequences of inbreeding on long-term survival and reproductive success (Darwinian fitness) are uncertain for vertebrates in the wild. Here, we report direct experimental evidence for vertebrates that competition increases the harmful effects of inbreeding on offspring survival and reproduction. We compared the fitness of inbred (from full-sib matings) and outbred wild house mice (Mus domesticus) in large, seminatural enclosures. Inbred males sired only one-fifth as many surviving offspring as outbred males because of their poor competitive ability and survivorship. In laboratory conditions, inbreeding had relatively minor effects on male reproductive success and no effect on survivorship. Seminatural conditions did not increase inbreeding depression for females, probably because females were not competing for any critical resources. The overall reduction in fitness from inbreeding was 57%, which is 4.5 times as great as previous estimates from the laboratory. These results have important implications for medicine, conservation, evolutionary biology, and functional genomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10716731      PMCID: PMC16238          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  37 in total

1.  Inbreeding and cancer incidence in human isolates.

Authors:  I Rudan
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Inbreeding depression in Japanese quail.

Authors:  K Sittmann; H Abplanalp; R A Fraser
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype.

Authors:  W K Potts; C J Manning; E K Wakeland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  INBREEDING EFFECTS UPON ANIMALS DERIVED FROM A WILD POPULATION OF MUS MUSCULUS.

Authors:  Carol Becker Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  INBREEDING IN DARWIN'S MEDIUM GROUND FINCHES (GEOSPIZA FORTIS).

Authors:  H Lisle Gibbs; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  PARASITE-MEDIATED SELECTION AGAINST INBRED SOAY SHEEP IN A FREE-LIVING ISLAND POPULATON.

Authors:  David W Coltman; Jill G Pilkington; Judith A Smith; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  INBREEDING AND ITS FITNESS EFFECTS IN AN INSULAR POPULATION OF SONG SPARROWS (MELOSPIZA MELODIA).

Authors:  Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS.

Authors:  Robert C Lacy; Glen Alaks; Allison Walsh
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Inverted repeat structure of the Sry locus in mice.

Authors:  J Gubbay; N Vivian; A Economou; D Jackson; P Goodfellow; R Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  77 in total

1.  A possible role for imprinted genes in inbreeding avoidance and dispersal from the natal area in mice.

Authors:  Anthony R Isles; Michael J Baum; Dan Ma; Abigail Szeto; Eric B Keverne; Nicholas D Allen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success.

Authors:  W Amos; J W Wilmer; K Fullard; T M Burg; J P Croxall; D Bloch; T Coulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The evolution of self-fertilization in density-regulated populations.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inbreeding and experience affect response to climate change by endangered woodpeckers.

Authors:  Karin Schiegg; Gilberto Pasinelli; Jeffrey R Walters; Susan J Daniels
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Severe inbreeding depression in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis).

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk; Ben C Sheldon; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Lukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Anna L Millard; Brent C Emerson; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population.

Authors:  Joseph I Hoffman; Fraser Simpson; Patrice David; Jolianne M Rijks; Thijs Kuiken; Michael A S Thorne; Robert C Lacy; Kanchon K Dasmahapatra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections.

Authors:  Dustin J Penn; Kristy Damjanovich; Wayne K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.