Literature DB >> 22777019

The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Tommaso Pizzari1, Andy Gardner.   

Abstract

The diversity of social interactions between sexual partners has long captivated biologists, and its evolution has been interpreted largely in terms of 'direct fitness' pay-offs to partners and their descendants. Inter-sexual interactions also have 'indirect effects' by affecting the fitness of relatives, with important consequences for inclusive fitness. However, inclusive fitness arguments have received limited consideration in this context, and definitions of 'direct' and 'indirect' fitness effects in this field are often inconsistent with those of inclusive fitness theory. Here, we use a sociobiology approach based on inclusive fitness theory to distinguish between direct and indirect fitness effects. We first consider direct effects: we review how competition leads to sexual conflict, and discuss the conditions under which repression of competition fosters sexual mutualism. We then clarify indirect effects, and show that greenbeard effects, kin recognition and population viscosity can all lead to episodes of indirect selection on sexual interactions creating potential for sexual altruism and spite. We argue that the integration of direct and indirect fitness effects within a sociobiology approach enables us to consider a more diverse spectrum of evolutionary outcomes of sexual interactions, and may help resolving current debates over sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22777019      PMCID: PMC3391422          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  60 in total

1.  Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions.

Authors:  D C Queller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genital damage, kicking and early death.

Authors:  H S Crudgington; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

4.  A first formal link between the price equation and an optimization program.

Authors:  Alan Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Sexual conflict and indirect benefits.

Authors:  E Cameron; T Day; L Rowes
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius.

Authors:  A D Stutt; M T Siva-Jothy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Hanne Løvlie; Charles K Cornwallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  19 in total

1.  Sexual and social competition: broadening perspectives by defining female roles.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Polyandry: the history of a revolution.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolutionary biology: Brotherly love benefits females.

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Nigel C Bennett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

7.  Evolution of female multiple mating: A quantitative model of the "sexually selected sperm" hypothesis.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Cedric K W Tan; Felicity Allen; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  No evidence that within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.