Literature DB >> 23339244

The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Luke Holman1, Hanna Kokko.   

Abstract

Polyandry, by elevating sexual conflict and selecting for reduced male care relative to monandry, may exacerbate the cost of sex and thereby seriously impact population fitness. On the other hand, polyandry has a number of possible population-level benefits over monandry, such as increased sexual selection leading to faster adaptation and a reduced mutation load. Here, we review existing information on how female fitness evolves under polyandry and how this influences population dynamics. In balance, it is far from clear whether polyandry has a net positive or negative effect on female fitness, but we also stress that its effects on individuals may not have visible demographic consequences. In populations that produce many more offspring than can possibly survive and breed, offspring gained or lost as a result of polyandry may not affect population size. Such ecological 'masking' of changes in population fitness could hide a response that only manifests under adverse environmental conditions (e.g. anthropogenic change). Surprisingly few studies have attempted to link mating system variation to population dynamics, and in general we urge researchers to consider the ecological consequences of evolutionary processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339244      PMCID: PMC3576587          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  108 in total

1.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes.

Authors:  Sarah R Pryke; Lee A Rollins; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards.

Authors:  Jean-François Le Galliard; Patrick S Fitze; Régis Ferrière; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hybridization between white-headed ducks and introduced ruddy ducks in Spain.

Authors:  V Muñoz-Fuentes; C Vilà; A J Green; J J Negro; M D Sorenson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual selection counteracts extinction of small populations of the bulb mites.

Authors:  Magdalena Jarzebowska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The role of multilevel selection in the evolution of sexual conflict in the water strider aquarius remigis.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; David Sloan Wilson; Michael J Dlugos; John W Pepper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings.

Authors:  Katharina Foerster; Kaspar Delhey; Arild Johnsen; Jan T Lifjeld; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Polyandry and the decrease of a selfish genetic element in a wild house mouse population.

Authors:  Andri Manser; Anna K Lindholm; Barbara König; Homayoun C Bagheri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  32 in total

1.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual selection protects against extinction.

Authors:  Alyson J Lumley; Łukasz Michalczyk; James J N Kitson; Lewis G Spurgin; Catriona A Morrison; Joanne L Godwin; Matthew E Dickinson; Oliver Y Martin; Brent C Emerson; Tracey Chapman; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mating portfolios: bet-hedging, sexual selection and female multiple mating.

Authors:  Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Yukio Yasui; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Mate choice in a polluted world: consequences for individuals, populations and communities.

Authors:  Ulrika Candolin; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Towards a predictive conservation biology: the devil is in the behaviour.

Authors:  Bernt-Erik Sæther; Steinar Engen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Sexual conflict between parents: offspring desertion and asymmetrical parental care.

Authors:  Tamás Székely
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Why inclusive fitness can make it adaptive to produce less fit extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sexual selection predicts species richness across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Michael G Ritchie; Edward H Morrow; Lucas Marie-Orleach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.