Literature DB >> 18211862

No postcopulatory response to inbreeding by male crickets.

Leigh W Simmons1, Melissa L Thomas.   

Abstract

Previous studies of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus have shown a paternity bias towards non-sibling males. Although non-kin-biased paternity could represent a mechanism of postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by females, evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) models of ejaculate evolution also predict that males should reduce their expenditure on the ejaculate when mating with their sisters. Here we provide a test of these models, finding that male crickets invest equally in matings with full-siblings, half-siblings and non-sibling females. The data suggest that in this species, males and females differ in their response to inbreeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211862      PMCID: PMC2429923          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  17 in total

1.  Molecular evidence of post-copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; Nina Wedell; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition.

Authors:  Francisco García-González; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  When not to avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Indrek Ots
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Beveridge; Nina Wedell; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Polyandry facilitates postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in house mice.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Male crickets adjust the viability of their sperm in response to female mating status.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Male crickets adjust ejaculate quality with both risk and intensity of sperm competition.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Amy Denholm; Chantelle Jackson; Esther Levy; Ewa Madon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Male-female relatedness and patterns of male reproductive investment in guppies.

Authors:  Luisa J Fitzpatrick; Clelia Gasparini; John L Fitzpatrick; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kathrin Langen; Julia Schwarzer; Harald Kullmann; Theo C M Bakker; Timo Thünken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.