Literature DB >> 16612884

Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

G A Parker1.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict is a conflict between the evolutionary interests of individuals of the two sexes. The sexes can have different trait optima but this need not imply conflict if their optima can be attained simultaneously. Conflict requires an interaction between males and females (e.g. mating or parental care), such that the optimal outcomes for each sex cannot be achieved simultaneously. It is important to distinguish between battleground models, which define the parameter space for conflict and resolution models, which seek solutions for how conflicts are resolved. Overt behavioural conflict may or may not be manifest at resolution. Following Fisherian principles, an immediate (i.e. direct) benefit to a male that has a direct cost to his female partner can have an indirect benefit to the female via her male progeny. Female resistance to mating has been claimed to represent concurrence rather than conflict, due to female benefits via sons (males with low mating advantage are screened out by resistance). However, the weight of current evidence (both theoretical and empirical) supports sexual conflict for many cases. I review (i) conflicts over mate quality, encounters between males and females of genetically diverged subpopulations, mating rate and inbreeding, (ii) the special features of postcopulatory sexual conflict and (iii) some general features of importance for conflict resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612884      PMCID: PMC1569603          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  90 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Sexy sons: a dead end for cytoplasmic genes.

Authors:  Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual selection and genital evolution.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Sexual conflict and speciation.

Authors:  G A Parker; L Partridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

10.  The function of female resistance behavior: intromission by male coercion vs. female cooperation in sepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae).

Authors:  William G Eberhard
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.723

View more
  148 in total

1.  Foraging costs drive female resistance to a sensory trap.

Authors:  Constantino Macías Garcia; Yolitzi Saldívar Lemus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Male sexual harassment alters female social behaviour towards other females.

Authors:  Safi K Darden; Lauren Watts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The evolution of optimal female mating rate changes the coevolutionary dynamics of female resistance and male persistence.

Authors:  Erem Kazancioğlu; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Semele: a killer-male, rescue-female system for suppression and replacement of insect disease vector populations.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Geoffrey W Pittman; Anna B Buchman; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry.

Authors:  Julie Collet; David S Richardson; Kirsty Worley; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict.

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.