Literature DB >> 17018820

Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research.

Patricia A Marshall1, Clement A Adebamowo, Adebowale A Adeyemo, Temidayo O Ogundiran, Mirjana Vekich, Teri Strenski, Jie Zhou, T Elaine Prewitt, Richard S Cooper, Charles N Rotimi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent among individuals of African ancestry enrolled in similarly designed genetic studies of hypertension in the United States and Nigeria.
METHODS: Survey questionnaires were used to evaluate factors associated with voluntariness (the number of people volunteering) and understanding of the study's genetic purpose. A total of 655 individuals (United States: 348; Nigeria: 307) were interviewed after participation in the genetic studies.
RESULTS: Most US respondents (99%), compared with 72% of Nigerian respondents, reported being told the study purpose. Fewer than half of the respondents at both sites reported that the study purpose was to learn about genetic inheritance of hypertension. Most respondents indicated that their participation was voluntary. In the United States, 97% reported that they could withdraw, compared with 67% in Nigeria. In Nigeria, nearly half the married women reported asking permission from husbands to enroll in the hypertension study; no respondents sought permission from local elders to participate in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for more effective approaches and interventions to improve comprehension of consent for genetic research among ethnically and linguistically diverse populations in all settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17018820      PMCID: PMC1751828          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.076232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  56 in total

1.  Multi-center genetic study of hypertension: The Family Blood Pressure Program (FBPP).

Authors: 
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Does the current consent process minimize the risks of genetics research?

Authors:  Dave Wendler; Kiran Prasad; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12-01

3.  Between universalism and relativism: a conceptual exploration of problems in formulating and applying international biomedical ethical guidelines.

Authors:  G B Tangwa
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The ethics of research in developing countries: assessing voluntariness.

Authors:  Christine A Pace; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Trust and informed consent: insights from community members on the Kenyan coast.

Authors:  C S Molyneux; N Peshu; K Marsh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Informed consent: practices and views of investigators in a multinational clinical trial.

Authors:  Lindsay Sabik; Christine A Pace; Heidi P Forster-Gertner; David Wendler; Judith D Bebchuk; Jorge A Tavel; Laura A McNay; Jack Killen; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

7.  A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations.

Authors:  M W Foster; D Bernsten; T H Carter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)...!': community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countries.

Authors:  C S Molyneux; D R Wassenaar; N Peshu; K Marsh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  34 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research.

Authors:  Charles N Rotimi; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 4.  African genetic diversity and adaptation inform a precision medicine agenda.

Authors:  Luisa Pereira; Leon Mutesa; Paulina Tindana; Michèle Ramsay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Decision-making and motivation to participate in biomedical research in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Pauline E Osamor; Nancy Kass
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.294

Review 6.  Recruiting underserved populations to dermatologic research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chaya R Spears; Bridgit V Nolan; Jenna L O'Neill; Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.736

7.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Exploring the Role of Shared Decision Making in the Consent Process for Pediatric Genomics Research in Cameroon, Tanzania, and Ghana.

Authors:  Daima Bukini; Jantina deVries; Marsha Treadwell; Kofi Anie; Jemima Dennis-Antwi; Karene Kengne Kamga; Sheryl McCurdy; Kwaku Ohene-Frempong; Julie Makani; Ambroise Wonkam
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2019-08-05

9.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Ethical considerations in conducting research on autism spectrum disorders in low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Tamara C Daley; Nidhi Singhal; Vibha Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.