Literature DB >> 16571700

Research recruitment through US central cancer registries: balancing privacy and scientific issues.

Laura M Beskow1, Robert S Sandler, Morris Weinberger.   

Abstract

Cancer registries are a valuable resource for recruiting participants for public health-oriented research, although such recruitment raises potentially competing concerns about patient privacy and participant accrual. We surveyed US central cancer registries about their policies for research contact with patients, and results showed substantial variation. The strategy used most frequently (37.5% of those that allowed patient contact), which was among the least restrictive, was for investigators to notify patients' physicians and then contact patients with an opt-out approach. The most restrictive strategy was for registry staff to obtain physician permission and contact patients with an opt-in approach. Population-based studies enhance cancer control efforts, and registry policies can affect researchers' ability to conduct such studies. Further discussion about balanced recruitment approaches that protect patient privacy and encourage beneficial research is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571700      PMCID: PMC1751818          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  27 in total

1.  The recruitment of research participants and the role of the treating physician.

Authors:  E M Meslin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A vision for cancer incidence surveillance in the United States.

Authors:  Holly L Howe; Brenda K Edwards; John L Young; Tiefu Shen; Dee W West; Mary Hutton; Catherine N Correa
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Physician consent and researchers' access to patients.

Authors:  B G Dicker; D L Kent
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The treating physician as active gatekeeper in the recruitment of research subjects.

Authors:  J H Gurwitz; E Guadagnoli; M B Landrum; R A Silliman; R Wolf; J C Weeks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  The potential and limitations of data from population-based state cancer registries.

Authors:  J N Izquierdo; V J Schoenbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Patient perspectives on research recruitment through cancer registries.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Robert S Sandler; Robert C Millikan; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Predictors of participation in genetic research in a primary care physician network.

Authors:  A W Helmes; D J Bowen; R Bowden; J Bengel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control--a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States).

Authors:  Phyllis A Wingo; Patricia M Jamison; Robert A Hiatt; Hannah K Weir; Paul M Gargiullo; Mary Hutton; Nancy C Lee; H Irene Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Association between hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutation carrier status and the risk of colon cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Lawrence M Silverman; Temitope Keku; Laura B Lawrence; Elizabeth M Rohlfs; Christopher F Martin; Joseph Galanko; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  29 in total

1.  An automated communication system in a contact registry for persons with rare diseases: scalable tools for identifying and recruiting clinical research participants.

Authors:  R L Richesson; H S Lee; D Cuthbertson; J Lloyd; K Young; J P Krischer
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Building a registry of research volunteers among older urban African Americans: recruitment processes and outcomes from a community-based partnership.

Authors:  Letha A Chadiha; Olivia G M Washington; Peter A Lichtenberg; Carmen R Green; Karen L Daniels; James S Jackson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-06

3.  Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Namey; Daniel K Nelson; Arlene M Davis; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Are racial differences in patient-physician cancer communication and information explained by background, predisposing, and enabling factors?

Authors:  Clara Manfredi; Karen Kaiser; Alicia K Matthews; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010-04

5.  Recruitment of representative samples for low incidence cancer populations: do registries deliver?

Authors:  Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko Carey; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Elizabeth Tracey
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  A randomized phase II dose-response exercise trial among colon cancer survivors: Purpose, study design, methods, and recruitment results.

Authors:  Justin C Brown; Andrea B Troxel; Bonnie Ky; Nevena Damjanov; Babette S Zemel; Michael R Rickels; Andrew D Rhim; Anil K Rustgi; Kerry S Courneya; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Emily E Namey; Patrick R Miller; Daniel K Nelson; Alexandra Cooper
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 May-Jun

9.  Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-up of cancer survivors accrued via self-referral versus cancer registry in the FRESH START Diet and exercise trial.

Authors:  Denise Clutter Snyder; Richard Sloane; David Lobach; Isaac M Lipkus; Bercedis Peterson; William Kraus; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Sampling in population-based cancer caregivers research.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Deborah A Kashy; Chiew Kwei Kaw; Tenbroeck Smith; Rachel L Spillers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.