Literature DB >> 20524383

Public opinions about participating in health research.

Kay Teschke1, Suhail Marino, Rong Chu, Joseph K C Tsui, M Anne Harris, Stephen A Marion.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Privacy legislation has limited options for recruiting subjects to health studies. Policy changes are motivated by assumptions about public attitudes towards participation, yet surveys of attitudes have rarely been done. We investigated public willingness to participate in health research and how willingness was affected by various factors.
METHODS: A survey of adults randomly selected from the telephone directory was conducted in British Columbia, Canada. Mailed self-administered questionnaires asked about willingness to participate in health research and the influence on willingness of the method of subject selection, the organization making the contact, and other factors.
RESULTS: There were 1,477 respondents (58% of eligible); 85% were willing to participate in health research at least sometimes. The organization making the contact influenced comfort about participation: 10% of respondents felt uncomfortable if contacted by a university, 12% if by a hospital, 26% if by government, and 55% if by private research firms. Factors most positively influencing choice to participate were future health benefits to society (87%) and oneself (87%), and receiving a copy of the study results (81%).
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in health research appears to be viewed favourably by members of the public, and participation may be highest when university or hospital-based researchers are able to contact subjects directly using information from government databases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20524383      PMCID: PMC6974298     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  22 in total

1.  Protecting privacy while facilitating research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance.

Authors:  Chris Verity; Angus Nicoll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

3.  Privacy and the secondary use of data for health research: experience in Canada and suggested directions forward.

Authors:  Donald Willison
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-07

4.  Data protection, informed consent, and research.

Authors:  Julian Peto; Olivia Fletcher; Clare Gilham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-01

5.  Personal privacy and public health: potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada.

Authors:  M Anne Harris; Adrian R Levy; Kay E Teschke
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

6.  Pharmacy computer prescription databases: methodologic issues of access and confidentiality.

Authors:  J A Beto; M C Geraci; P A Marshall; V K Bansal
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Geraldine Barrett; Jackie A Cassell; Janet L Peacock; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-28

8.  What proportion of patients refuse consent to data collection from their records for research purposes?

Authors:  R Baker; C Shiels; K Stevenson; R Fraser; M Stone
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data.

Authors:  Donald J Willison; Karim Keshavjee; Kalpana Nair; Charlie Goldsmith; Anne M Holbrook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

10.  Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Jeffrey R Botkin; Mary Daly; Eric T Juengst; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jon F Merz; Rebecca Pentz; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Jeremy Sugarman; Lisa R Susswein; Sharon F Terry; Melissa A Austin; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  10 in total

1.  Well-done meat intake and meat-derived mutagen exposures in relation to breast cancer risk: the Nashville Breast Health Study.

Authors:  Zhenming Fu; Sandra L Deming; Alecia M Fair; Martha J Shrubsole; Debra M Wujcik; Xiao-Ou Shu; Mark Kelley; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Why do people participate in epidemiological research?

Authors:  Claudia Slegers; Deborah Zion; Deborah Glass; Helen Kelsall; Lin Fritschi; Ngiare Brown; Bebe Loff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Recruitment for Occupational Research: Using Injured Workers as the Point of Entry into Workplaces.

Authors:  Mieke Koehoorn; Catherine M Trask; Kay Teschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.

Authors:  D C Glass; H L Kelsall; C Slegers; A B Forbes; B Loff; D Zion; L Fritschi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Learning from older peoples' reasons for participating in demanding, intensive epidemiological studies: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alicja M Baczynska; Sarah C Shaw; Harnish P Patel; Avan A Sayer; Helen C Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Our data, our society, our health: A vision for inclusive and transparent health data science in the United Kingdom and beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ford; Andy Boyd; Juliana K F Bowles; Alys Havard; Robert W Aldridge; Vasa Curcin; Michelle Greiver; Katie Harron; Vittal Katikireddi; Sarah E Rodgers; Matthew Sperrin
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2019-03-25

7.  Producers of Engineered Nanomaterials-What Motivates Company and Worker Participation in Biomonitoring Programs?

Authors:  Camille Crézé; Marjorie François; Nancy B Hopf; Victor Dorribo; Jean-Jacques Sauvain; Enrico Bergamaschi; Giacomo Garzaro; Maida Domat; Judith Friesl; Eva Penssler; Athena Progiou; Irina Guseva Canu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Jordanian views regarding sharing of medical data for research: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Moawiah Khatatbeh; Lobna F Gharaibeh; Omar F Khabour; Rana K Abu-Farha; Karem H Alzoubi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptions and attitudes to clinical research participation in Qatar.

Authors:  Hiba Tohid; Sopna M Choudhury; Sahar Agouba; Abdi Aden; Lina H M Ahmed; Omar Omar; Odette Chagoury; Shahrad Taheri
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Clinical trials: Predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation.

Authors:  Oriana Awwad; Sajeda Maaiah; Basima A Almomani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.