Literature DB >> 12843405

Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society.

Peter M Buston1, Stephen T Emlen.   

Abstract

This study tested two hypotheses concerning the cognitive processes underlying human mate choice in Western society: (i) mate preference is conditional in that the selectivity of individuals' mate preference is based on their perception of themselves as long-term partners, and (ii) the decision rule governing such conditional mate preference is based on translating perception of oneself on a given attribute into a comparable selectivity of preference for the same attribute in a mate. Both hypotheses were supported. A two-part questionnaire was completed by 978 heterosexual residents of Ithaca, New York, aged 18-24; they first rated the importance they placed on 10 attributes in a long-term partner and then rated their perception of themselves on those same attributes. Both women and men who rated themselves highly were significantly more selective in their mate preference. When the 10 attributes were grouped into four evolutionarily relevant categories (indicative of wealth and status, family commitment, physical appearance, and sexual fidelity), the greatest amount of variation in the selectivity of mate preference in each category was explained by self-perception in the same category of attributes. We conclude that, in Western society, humans use neither an "opposites-attract" nor a "reproductive-potentials-attract" decision rule in their choice of long-term partners but rather a "likes-attract" rule based on a preference for partners who are similar to themselves across a number of characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12843405      PMCID: PMC166394          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1533220100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Differential fertility in relation to body dimensions.

Authors:  P J CLARK; J N SPUHLER
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice.

Authors:  T Bereczkei; S Voros; A Gal; L Bernath
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.897

3.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Assortative marriage.

Authors:  R J Garrison; V E Anderson; S C Reed
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1968-06

Review 5.  Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome.

Authors:  E Epstein; R Guttman
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1984 Fall-Winter

6.  Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions.

Authors:  B Pawłowski; R I Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Likeness and completeness theories examined by sixteen personality factor measures on stably and unstably married couples.

Authors:  R R Cattell; J R Nesselroade
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1967-12

8.  Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model.

Authors:  A Feingold
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: evidence for female choice in mammals?

Authors:  M B Mulder
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.980

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Are high-quality mates always attractive?: State-dependent mate preferences in birds and humans.

Authors:  Katharina Riebel; Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Simon Verhulst; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Genetic and socioeconomic study of mate choice in Latinos reveals novel assortment patterns.

Authors:  James Y Zou; Danny S Park; Esteban G Burchard; Dara G Torgerson; Maria Pino-Yanes; Yun S Song; Sriram Sankararaman; Eran Halperin; Noah Zaitlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate.

Authors:  Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Katharina Riebel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Is Friendship Network Weight Status Associated with One's Own Psychological Well-being? It Depends on One's Own Weight Status.

Authors:  Paul T Fuglestad; Melanie M Wall; Jin Joo Shim; Marla E Eisenberg; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-05

5.  An evolutionary account of status, power, and career in modern societies.

Authors:  Martin Fieder; Susanne Huber
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

6.  Men's reproductive investment decisions : Mating, Parenting, and Self-perceived Mate Value.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; Frank W Marlowe
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-03

7.  Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences.

Authors:  Peter M Todd; Lars Penke; Barbara Fasolo; Alison P Lenton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A mathematical model of sentimental dynamics accounting for marital dissolution.

Authors:  José-Manuel Rey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Potentials-attract or likes-attract in human mate choice in China.

Authors:  Qiao-Qiao He; Zhen Zhang; Jian-Xin Zhang; Zhi-Guo Wang; Ying Tu; Ting Ji; Yi Tao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.