Literature DB >> 24053135

The male advantage in child facial resemblance detection: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Haiyan Wu1, Suyong Yang, Shiyue Sun, Chao Liu, Yue-Jia Luo.   

Abstract

Males have been suggested to have advantages over females in reactions to child facial resemblance, which reflects the evolutionary pressure on males to solve the adaptive paternal uncertainty problem and to identify biological offspring. However, previous studies showed inconsistent results and the male advantage in child facial resemblance perception, as a kin detection mechanism, is still unclear. Here, we investigated the behavioral and brain mechanisms underlying the self-resembling faces processing and how it interacts with sex and age using event-related potential (ERP) technique. The results showed a stable male advantage in self-resembling child faces processing, such that males have higher detectability to self-resembling child faces than females. For ERP results, males showed smaller N2 and larger late positive component (LPC) amplitudes for self-resembling child faces, which may reflect face-matching and self-referential processing in kin detection, respectively. Further source analysis showed that the N2 component and LPC were originated from the anterior cingulate cortex and medial frontal gyrus, respectively. Our results support the male advantage in self-resembling child detection and further indicate that such distinctions can be found in both early and late processing stages in the brain at different regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24053135      PMCID: PMC3815694          DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2013.835279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  64 in total

1.  An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Amanda Holmes
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Firstborns' disadvantage in kinship detection.

Authors:  Gwenaël Kaminski; Fabien Ravary; Christian Graff; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-11-04

3.  The P300 is sensitive to concealed face recognition.

Authors:  Ewout H Meijer; Fren T Y Smulders; Harald L G J Merckelbach; Ann G Wolf
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun; M H Buonocore; M Girelli; A P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Talis pater, talis filius: perceived resemblance and the belief in genetic relatedness.

Authors:  Paola Bressan; Maria F Dal Martello
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

6.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  The own-age face recognition bias in children and adults.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Michael B Lewis
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Facial resemblance enhances trust.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Where am I? The neurological correlates of self and other.

Authors:  Steven M Platek; Julian Paul Keenan; Gordon G Gallup; Feroze B Mohamed
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

10.  Kin recognition signals in adult faces.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Finlay G Smith; Benedict C Jones; S Craig Roberts; Marion Petrie; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  How context influences the interpretation of facial expressions: a source localization high-density EEG study on the "Kuleshov effect".

Authors:  Marta Calbi; Francesca Siri; Katrin Heimann; Daniel Barratt; Vittorio Gallese; Anna Kolesnikov; Maria Alessandra Umiltà
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The Study of Face Processing in Social Anxiety Disorder Based on Face-Specific N170 Component.

Authors:  Xuejing Bi; Min Guo; Jianqin Cao; Yanhua Hao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.