Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception.

Literature DB >> 15376794

The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception.

Mark Yates¹, Lawrence Locker, Greg B Simpson.

Abstract

In the research reported here, we investigated the influence of phonological neighborhood density on the processing of words in the visual lexical decision task. The results of the first experiment revealed that words with large phonological neighborhoods were verified more rapidly than words with small phonological neighborhoods. In the second experiment, we replicated this effect with a more tightly controlled set of stimuli. These results demonstrate the importance of phonological codes when processing visually presented letter strings. We relate this research to previous results on semantic and orthographic neighborhoods and discuss the results within the context of a model in which lexical decisions are based on stimulus familiarity.

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15376794 DOI： 10.3758/bf03196594

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychon Bull Rev ISSN： 1069-9384

11 in total

1. Homophone effects in lexical decision.

Authors: P M Pexman; S J Lupker; D Jared
Journal: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.

Authors: M Coltheart; K Rastle; C Perry; R Langdon; J Ziegler
Journal: Psychol Rev Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 8.934

3. Characterizing semantic space: neighborhood effects in word recognition.

Authors: L Buchanan; C Westbury; C Burgess
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2001-09

4. Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.

Authors: Mark Yates; Lawrence Locker; Greg B Simpson
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2003-09

5. Similarity relations among spoken words: the special status of rimes in English.

Authors: Bruno De Cara; Usha Goswami
Journal: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput Date: 2002-08

Review 6. Processing implicit and explicit representations.

Authors: D L Nelson; T A Schreiber; C L McEvoy
Journal: Psychol Rev Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 8.934

7. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors: J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal: Psychol Rev Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.934

8. A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors: G C Van Orden
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1987-05

Review 9. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors: G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 3.332

10. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors: P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 3.570

18 in total

1. Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages.

Authors: Viorica Marian; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Olga V Boukrina
Journal: J Psycholinguist Res Date: 2008-05

2. Phonology and orthography in reading aloud.

Authors: Niels O Schiller
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2007-06

3. Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies.

Authors: James S Adelman; Gordon D A Brown
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2007-06

4. Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors: Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.051