Literature DB >> 14651294

Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.

Mark Yates1, Lawrence Locker, Greg B Simpson.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the relationship between semantics and phonology in the lexical decision task. In the first experiment, lexical decisions to words with large semantic neighborhoods were faster than those to words with sparse semantic neighborhoods. Conversely, this effect of semantic neighborhood was reversed for pseudohomophones (e.g., nale). That is, pseudohomophones based on words with large semantic neighborhoods took longer to reject than did those based on words with sparse semantic neighborhoods. In the second experiment, we found the magnitude of the semantic neighborhood effect for words to be a function of nonword foil type. Taken together, these results indicate that semantic neighborhood size affects processing of both words and pseudohomophones, and that the effect of semantic neighborhood size for words is more pronounced when pseudohomophone foils are employed. These effects are discussed in terms of a model in which the orthographic, phonological, and semantic systems are fully interactive.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14651294     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.

Authors:  J C Ziegler; A M Jacobs; D Klüppel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Diagnostics of phonological lexical processing: pseudohomophone naming advantages, disadvantages, and base-word frequency effects.

Authors:  Ron Borowsky; William J Owen; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

3.  Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; A Petersen; M C MacDonald; D C Plaut
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.

Authors:  P Gibbs; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

Review 6.  Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; N R Gee; T A Schreiber; V M McKinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing.

Authors:  D Besner; E Davelaar
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1983-06

9.  Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition.

Authors:  K R Pugh; K Rexer; L Katz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  10 in total

1.  The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Lawrence Locker; Greg B Simpson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

2.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Adult and child semantic neighbors of the Kroll and Potter (1984) nonobjects.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Suzanne M Adlof
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  NoA's Ark: influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Alberto Avilés; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

5.  Meaning Inhibition and Sentence Processing in Chinese.

Authors:  Michael C W Yip
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

6.  Word learning in adults with second-language experience: effects of phonological and referent familiarity.

Authors:  Margarita Kaushanskaya; Jeewon Yoo; Stephanie Van Hecke
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The effect of semantic set size on word learning by preschool children.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Suzanne M Adlof
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Werner Sommer; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Lexical access and evoked traveling alpha waves.

Authors:  Andrea Zauner; Walter Gruber; Nicole Alexandra Himmelstoß; Julia Lechinger; Wolfgang Klimesch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.