Literature DB >> 18204961

Osteoporosis in a female population from Bratislava--age-related BMD changes.

Jaroslava Wendlová1, Viera Pacáková.   

Abstract

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed 498 women (n=498) in a Bratislava (BA) population aged 21 to 90. We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal femur with one densitometric instrument (DXA Osteocore II, France; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), applying BMD and T-score values in three standard regions of interest: Neck (ROI1), Ward's area (ROI2), Trochanter (ROI3).
RESULTS: Measured values of T-score in ROI1, ROI2 had normal distribution and a lognormal distribution of frequency in ROI3. Using chi2-test (chi-square goodness-of-fit statistics), we determined the distribution of the frequency of T-score values and the percentage of osteoporosis incidence in the Bratislava female population. The osteoporosis incidence, according to T-score values measured in ROI1 was 2.40%, in ROI2 16.34% and in ROI3 3.83%. Following the division of women into ten-year intervals, the statistically significant sample averages of T-score values were decreasing in relation to age only for ROI2. Osteoporosis incidence in age intervals was rising with age for ROI2, for ROI1 the number of osteoporotic patients in the 61 to 70-year interval was lower than in the 41 to 50-year interval, and for ROI3 the number of osteoporotic patients in the 51 to 60-year interval was lower than in the 41 to 50-year interval. Except in the above-mentioned intervals, T-score values decreased in relation to age also in ROI1 and ROI3. According to the analysis of variance, the age category explains 9.6% of the overall variability of T-score values for ROI1, 24.7% for ROI2 and 11.70% for ROI3.
CONCLUSIONS: As in ROI2 (Ward's area) a greater fraction of trabecular bone is measured in comparison with ROI1 and ROI3, ROI2 reflects best the age-related BMD changes. In ROI1 and ROI3 the relation was distorted by a greater fraction of cortical bone in comparison with ROI2 and by osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18204961     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-007-0489-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  15 in total

1.  Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Liu; M Peacock; O Eilam; G Dorulla; E Braunstein; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures.

Authors:  C Bergot; A M Laval-Jeantet; K Hutchinson; I Dautraix; F Caulin; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Lifetime risk of hip fractures is underestimated.

Authors:  A Oden; A Dawson; W Dere; O Johnell; B Jonsson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Health impact associated with vertebral deformities: results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS).

Authors:  C Matthis; U Weber; T W O'Neill; H Raspe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?

Authors:  L J Melton; E A Chrischilles; C Cooper; A W Lane; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Absolute fracture risk varies with bone densitometry technique used. A theoretical and in vivo study of fracture cases.

Authors:  Glen M Blake; Karen M Knapp; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 10.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; Ronald C Hamdy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  Metabolic bone diseases: basic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

2.  T-plus Z-score in the assessment of relative fracture risk.

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.