Literature DB >> 3602380

Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT.

W A Kalender, E Klotz, C Suess.   

Abstract

In the assessment of vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) with quantitative computed tomography, accuracy is limited by systematic errors caused by beam-hardening effects and unknown marrow and fat concentrations in trabecular bone. Reproducibility depends on precise repositioning of the patient, selection of the region of interest (ROI), and apparatus stability. In an integrated approach, these error sources were taken into account. Dual-energy methods are incorporated and tested to avoid systematic errors. Contour-detection algorithms for automated ROI determination that work reliably and offer improved reproducibility and efficiency are presented. A new design of reference phantom with solid tissue-equivalent materials provides calibration in BMD units and checks apparatus stability. Dual-energy methods are necessary to achieve accuracy of 5% or better. Automated ROI definition and reference phantom methods are mandatory for reproducibility of 2% or better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3602380     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.164.2.3602380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

Authors:  S Grampp; S Majumdar; M Jergas; P Lang; A Gies; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Normal bone density in Irish women: is American normative data suitable for use in Ireland?

Authors:  J Harbison; L Daly; B Murphy; C McCoy; J Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.

Authors:  R B Mazess; P Pedersen; J Vetter; H S Barden
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Accuracy of vertebral mineral determination by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; C P Adler; W A Kalender; R Lente
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Bone status in elite male runners.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Klaus Engelke; Heiko Baumann; Carola Beeskow; Simon von Stengel; Jürgen Weineck; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Does thoracic or lumbar spine bone architecture predict vertebral failure strength more accurately than density?

Authors:  E-M Lochmüller; K Pöschl; L Würstlin; M Matsuura; R Müller; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Dual-energy CT iodine-subtraction virtual unenhanced technique to detect urinary stones in an iodine-filled collecting system: a phantom study.

Authors:  Naoki Takahashi; Robert P Hartman; Terri J Vrtiska; Akira Kawashima; Andrew N Primak; Oleksandr P Dzyubak; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul K Commean; Tao Ju; Lu Liu; David R Sinacore; Mary K Hastings; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.