Literature DB >> 17112426

Assessing bone mass in children and adolescents.

Tishya A L Wren1, Vicente Gilsanz.   

Abstract

Growing awareness that osteoporosis may have its antecedents in childhood has led to increasing interest in assessing bone mass in children and adolescents. Several noninvasive imaging techniques are currently available to measure properties of the growing skeleton, including bone mass, density, cross-sectional area, and microarchitecture. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used technique, but it has several major limitations associated with its dependence on two-dimensional projections. Quantitative CT and peripheral quantitative CT allow three-dimensional imaging but are more costly and have higher radiation exposure. Quantitative ultrasound is simple and inexpensive but can measure bone "quality" only at a single peripheral site. MRI techniques for measuring bone are still under development and not yet ready for clinical use. For all of these techniques, clinical interpretation of the bone measures obtained remains a significant challenge. Further research is needed to relate these measures to osteoporosis in the elderly and to short-term and long-term fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17112426     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-996-0024-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  59 in total

1.  Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  T Lang; P Augat; S Majumdar; X Ouyang; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.

Authors:  S L Hui; S Gao; X H Zhou; C C Johnston; Y Lu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; H Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography.

Authors:  T N Hangartner; V Gilsanz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.

Authors:  N F Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Reproducibility and error sources of micro-MRI-based trabecular bone structural parameters of the distal radius and tibia.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; F W Wehrli; B Vasilić; R H Weening; P K Saha; H K Song; A C Wright
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  P Tothill; D W Pye
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology.

Authors:  H Kröger; P Vainio; J Nieminen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) on DXA evaluation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Bianchi; Sanford Baim; Nick J Bishop; Catherine M Gordon; Didier B Hans; Craig B Langman; Mary B Leonard; Heidi J Kalkwarf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Comparison of the relationship between bone marrow adipose tissue and volumetric bone mineral density in children and adults.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Gilbert Velasquez; Jun Chen; Ye Jin; Steven B Heymsfield; Dympna Gallagher; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Bone mass and density in preadolescent boys with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  J Wu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Exercise and bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Melonie Burrows
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in children.

Authors:  Fawaz F Alqahtani; Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-11-12

7.  Evaluation of bone mineralization in former preterm born children: Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound cannot replace dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Carmen M T Lageweg; Mayke E van der Putten; Johannes B van Goudoever; Ton Feuth; Martin Gotthardt; Arno F J van Heijst; Viola Christmann
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2018-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.