Literature DB >> 19701626

Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Roger G Lemaire1.   

Abstract

Two hundred and six consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed in 180 patients with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis. At mean follow-up of 78 months (range: 60-102 months), the outcomes of 181 knees in 158 patients were evaluated using the American Knee Society's Knee and Functional scoring system and Radiological scoring system. Mean values for Knee and Function scores were 92.6 and 81.1, respectively versus 51.8 and 43.4 preoperatively; mean flexion range was 113.6 degrees versus 110.8 degrees preoperatively. There were no cases of bearing dislocation and no radiological signs of loosening or osteolysis. Secondary patella resurfacing was done in 7 of 52 knees in which the patella was not primarily resurfaced. Arthroplasty survival with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100% (95% CI: 97.7-100) at 5 years and at 8 years (95% CI: 87.2-100); with revision of the arthroplasty for any reason including one revision for infection as the endpoint, survival was 99.5% (95% CI: 96.9-100) at 5 years and at 8 years (95% CI: 86.9-100). The overall results were satisfactory and compared with those of other mobile-bearing knee prostheses featuring full or partial congruence. No significant differences were noted for range of motion, knee scores and function scores between two subsets of knees that received a bearing allowing only rotation or rotation and 5 mm anteroposterior translation. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate possible benefits of high congruence and of specific modes of bearing mobility with respect to wear and bony fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701626     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0883-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  69 in total

Review 1.  Mobile bearings in primary knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J Vertullo; M E Easley; W N Scott; J N Insall
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements.

Authors:  T Watanabe; T Tomita; M Fujii; J Hashimoto; K Sugamoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses.

Authors:  D Biau; M M Mullins; T Judet; P Piriou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alastair Hudd; Kumar Kunasingam; David Ricketts; John Bush
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Matsuda; S E White; V G Williams; D S McCarthy; L A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; S-H Yoon; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-10

8.  Lateral retinacular release rates in mobile- versus fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Charles C Yang; Lee A McFadden; Douglas A Dennis; Raymond H Kim; Adrija Sharma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement.

Authors:  V Wylde; I Learmonth; A Potter; K Bettinson; E Lingard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-09

10.  Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Matthias U Schafroth; Leendert Blankevoort; Gerard R Schaap; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Steffen Höll; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Nicolo Martinelli; Sven Ostermeier; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of patellar retention versus resurfacing in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bo-Hyun Hwang; Ick-Hwan Yang; Chang-Dong Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Rolf Miehlke; Dominique Saragaglia; Robert Geyer; Numa Mercier; Jean-Yves Schoenahl; Birger Thiel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.