Literature DB >> 24938395

Survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, mobile-bearing, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Michele Ulivi1, Luca Orlandini, Valentina Meroni, Olmo Consonni, Valerio Sansone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the long-term clinical and radiographic results and survivorship of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilised knee prosthesis at minimum 10 years (mean 11.5 ± 1.41 years), and to test the hypothesis that this design would have a mechanical survivorship greater than 95%.
METHODS: Between 2000 and 2002, 160 consecutive patients (166 knees) underwent total knee arthroplasty using a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilised prosthesis, and clinical and radiographic follow-up data were gathered prospectively.
RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients (112 knees) were available for final follow-up. Five patients (3%) had undergone revision surgery, giving a Kaplan-Meier survival rate of 96.6% for all causes of failure. No spin-out of the polyethylene insert was observed. The mean visual analogue scale, Knee Society and Oxford Knee Scores showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001). On radiographs, two cases (2.4%) had radiolucent lines >2 mm, and no patient had osteolysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The absence of osteolysis at minimum 10 years seems to support our hypothesis that this design may be able to reduce peri-prosthetic bone resorption in the long term. The survivorship was greater than 95% and is comparable to the best results reported for this type of knee prosthesis in the literature. The clinical scores are reasonable, given the presence of various disabling concomitant pathologies and the relatively advanced mean age of the study population. This study is clinically relevant because it adds valuable information to the limited data regarding the long-term survivorship and performance of rotating-platform knee prostheses and, more specifically, of a single knee design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24938395     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3118-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ephrat Most; Guoan Li; Steven Schule; Peter Sultan; Sang Eun Park; Shay Zayontz; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Knee scores in a 'normal' elderly population.

Authors:  A T Bremner-Smith; P Ewings; A E Weale
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  O Bailey; K Ferguson; E Crawfurd; P James; P A May; S Brown; M Blyth; W J Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence.

Authors:  A C Merchant; R L Mercer; R H Jacobsen; C R Cool
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation.

Authors:  H M McEwen; J Fisher; A A Goldsmith; D D Auger; C Hardaker; M H Stone
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey low-contact stress total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Bert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years.

Authors:  A Lädermann; A Lübbeke; R Stern; N Riand; D Fritschy
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Jason Glynn; Jonathan Sembrano; Kathleen Suthers; Edward R G Santos; Jasvinder Singh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mobility of the rotating platform in low contact stress knee arthroplasty is durable.

Authors:  Arthur Zürcher; Kim van Hutten; Jaap Harlaar; Ruud Pöll
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Total and intercondylar notch bone resection in posterior stabilized knee arthroplasty: analysis of five manufacturer designs.

Authors:  Murat Bozkurt; Mesut Tahta; Safa Gursoy; Mustafa Akkaya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double blinded randomized trial.

Authors:  Cameron J Killen; Michael P Murphy; William J Hopkinson; Melvyn A Harrington; William H Adams; Harold W Rees
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-03-29

4.  Minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty is less popular, but the prosthesis designed specifically for MIS provides good survival and PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Shinya Toyoda; Takao Kaneko; Yuta Mochizuki; Masaru Hada; Kazutaka Takada; Hiroyasu Ikegami; Yoshiro Musha
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.