Literature DB >> 15326133

Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers.

Linda M Zangwill1, Kwokleung Chan, Christopher Bowd, Jicuang Hao, Te-Won Lee, Robert N Weinreb, Terrence J Sejnowski, Michael H Goldbaum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether topographical measurements of the parapapillary region analyzed by machine learning classifiers can detect early to moderate glaucoma better than similarly processed measurements obtained within the disc margin and to improve methods for optimization of machine learning classifier feature selection.
METHODS: One eye of each of 95 patients with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field damage and of each of 135 normal subjects older than 40 years participating in the longitudinal Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS) were included. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT; Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany) mean height contour was measured in 36 equal sectors, both along the disc margin and in the parapapillary region (at a mean contour line radius of 1.7 mm). Each sector was evaluated individually and in combination with other sectors. Gaussian support vector machine (SVM) learning classifiers were used to interpret HRT sector measurements along the disc margin and in the parapapillary region, to differentiate between eyes with normal and glaucomatous visual fields and to compare the results with global and regional HRT parameter measurements. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to measure diagnostic performance of the HRT parameters and to evaluate the cross-validation strategies and forward selection and backward elimination optimization techniques that were used to generate the reduced feature sets.
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for mean height contour of the 36 sectors along the disc margin was larger than that for the mean height contour in the parapapillary region (0.97 and 0.85, respectively). Of the 36 individual sectors along the disc margin, those in the inferior region between 240 degrees and 300 degrees, had the largest area under the ROC curve (0.85-0.91). With SVM Gaussian techniques, the regional parameters showed the best ability to discriminate between normal eyes and eyes with glaucomatous visual field damage, followed by the global parameters, mean height contour measures along the disc margin, and mean height contour measures in the parapapillary region. The area under the ROC curve was 0.98, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.85, respectively. Cross-validation and optimization techniques demonstrated that good discrimination (99% of peak area under the ROC curve) can be obtained with a reduced number of HRT parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Mean height contour measurements along the disc margin discriminated between normal and glaucomatous eyes better than measurements obtained in the parapapillary region. Copyright Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15326133      PMCID: PMC2928389          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  26 in total

1.  Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Linda M Zangwill; Eytan Z Blumenthal; Cristiana Vasile; Andreas G Boehm; Parag A Gokhale; Kourosh Mohammadi; Payam Amini; Timothy M Sankary; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph.

Authors:  L M Zangwill; C Bowd; C C Berry; J Williams; E Z Blumenthal; C A Sánchez-Galeana; C Vasile; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

3.  Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography.

Authors:  R Bathija; L Zangwill; C C Berry; P A Sample; R N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Relationship of optic disc topography to optic nerve fiber number in glaucoma.

Authors:  Y H Yücel; N Gupta; M W Kalichman; A P Mizisin; W Hare; M de Souza Lima; L Zangwill; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-04

5.  Regional test-retest variability of confocal scanning laser tomography.

Authors:  L Brigatti; M Weitzman; J Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick; J B Rogers
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device.

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; R O Burk; F E Kruse; H E Völcker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes.

Authors:  M Iester; J B Jonas; C Y Mardin; W M Budde
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; M Lusky; D U Bartsch; D Morsman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  A Sommer; J Katz; H A Quigley; N R Miller; A L Robin; R C Richter; K A Witt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01
View more
  28 in total

1.  Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Luo; Bor-Wen Cheng
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Scanning laser ophthalmoscopic parameters of eyes with exfoliation syndrome.

Authors:  Ali Bulent Cankaya; Emrullah Beyazyildiz
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography in Taiwan Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Chen; Mei-Ling Huang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Combining information from 3 anatomic regions in the diagnosis of glaucoma with time-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mingwu Wang; Ake Tzu-Hui Lu; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David S Greenfield; David Huang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Optical coherence tomography machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Tianjiao Chu; Joseph D Ramsey; Clark Glymour; Robert J Noecker; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Morphometric analysis and classification of glaucomatous optic neuropathy using radial polynomials.

Authors:  Michael D Twa; Srinivasan Parthasarathy; Chris A Johnson; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Analysis with support vector machine shows HIV-positive subjects without infectious retinitis have mfERG deficiencies compared to normal eyes.

Authors:  Michael H Goldbaum; Irina Falkenstein; Igor Kozak; Jiucang Hao; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Terrance Sejnowski; William R Freeman
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

9.  Machine learning classifiers detect subtle field defects in eyes of HIV individuals.

Authors:  Igor Kozak; Pamela A Sample; Jiucang Hao; William R Freeman; Robert N Weinreb; Te-Won Lee; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

10.  Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection.

Authors:  K A Townsend; G Wollstein; D Danks; K R Sung; H Ishikawa; L Kagemann; M L Gabriele; J S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.