Literature DB >> 18523087

Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 machine learning classifiers for glaucoma detection.

K A Townsend1, G Wollstein, D Danks, K R Sung, H Ishikawa, L Kagemann, M L Gabriele, J S Schuman.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess performance of classifiers trained on Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 (HRT3) parameters for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
METHODS: Classifiers were trained using HRT3 parameters from 60 healthy subjects and 140 glaucomatous subjects. The classifiers were trained on all 95 variables and smaller sets created with backward elimination. Seven types of classifiers, including Support Vector Machines with radial basis (SVM-radial), and Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees (RPART), were trained on the parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for classifiers, individual parameters and HRT3 glaucoma probability scores (GPS). Classifier AUCs and leave-one-out accuracy were compared with the highest individual parameter and GPS AUCs and accuracies.
RESULTS: The highest AUC and accuracy for an individual parameter were 0.848 and 0.79, for vertical cup/disc ratio (vC/D). For GPS, global GPS performed best with AUC 0.829 and accuracy 0.78. SVM-radial with all parameters showed significant improvement over global GPS and vC/D with AUC 0.916 and accuracy 0.85. RPART with all parameters provided significant improvement over global GPS with AUC 0.899 and significant improvement over global GPS and vC/D with accuracy 0.875.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning classifiers of HRT3 data provide significant enhancement over current methods for detection of glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523087      PMCID: PMC2916743          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.133074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  19 in total

1.  Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph.

Authors:  L M Zangwill; C Bowd; C C Berry; J Williams; E Z Blumenthal; C A Sánchez-Galeana; C Vasile; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

2.  Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Kwokleung Chan; Linda M Zangwill; Michael H Goldbaum; Te-Won Lee; Terrence J Sejnowski; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Interobserver variability of optic disk variables measured by confocal scanning laser tomography.

Authors:  M Iester; F S Mikelberg; P Courtright; R O Burk; J Caprioli; J B Jonas; R N Weinreb; L Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment.

Authors:  Julio E Deleón-Ortega; Stella N Arthur; Gerald McGwin; Aiyuan Xie; Blythe E Monheit; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.

Authors:  D F Garway-Heath; D Poinoosawmy; G Wollstein; A Viswanathan; D Kamal; L Fontana; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images.

Authors:  N V Swindale; G Stjepanovic; A Chin; F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements.

Authors:  Christian Y Mardin; Andrea Peters; Folkert Horn; Anselm G Jünemann; Berthold Lausen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Ferreras; Ana B Pajarín; Vicente Polo; José M Larrosa; Luís E Pablo; Francisco M Honrubia
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Sonia Jain; Lyne Racette; Karin B Ernstrom; Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  8 in total

1.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Combining information from 3 anatomic regions in the diagnosis of glaucoma with time-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mingwu Wang; Ake Tzu-Hui Lu; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David S Greenfield; David Huang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Investigation of the Role of Convolutional Neural Network Architectures in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma using Color Fundus Photography.

Authors:  Eray Atalay; Onur Özalp; Özer Can Devecioğlu; Hakika Erdoğan; Türker İnce; Nilgün Yıldırım
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-29

4.  Glaucomatous patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Intae Lee; Giljin Jang; Siamak Yousefi; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Optic disc topography in Malay patients with normal-tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Abdul Rahim Adlina; Koh Alisa-Victoria; Ismail Shatriah; Ahmad Tajudin Liza-Sharmini; Mt Saad Ahmad
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-12

6.  Effect of Photorefractive Keratectomy on Optic Nerve Head Topography and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measured by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.

Authors:  Naveed Nilforushan; Pejvak Azadi; Reza Soudi; Yahya Shaheen; Kourosh Sheibani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT.

Authors:  Kleyton Arlindo Barella; Vital Paulino Costa; Vanessa Gonçalves Vidotti; Fabrício Reis Silva; Marcelo Dias; Edson Satoshi Gomi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Correlation between retinal nerve fiber layer and disc parameters in glaucoma suspected eyes.

Authors:  Sanja Sefic Kasumovic; Suzana Pavljasevic; Emir Cabric; Milka Mavija; Sabina Dacic-Lepara; Mirko Jankov
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.