Literature DB >> 20703679

Diagnosing breast masses in digital mammography using feature selection and ensemble methods.

Shu-Ting Luo1, Bor-Wen Cheng.   

Abstract

Methods that can accurately predict breast cancer are greatly needed and good prediction techniques can help to predict breast cancer more accurately. In this study, we used two feature selection methods, forward selection (FS) and backward selection (BS), to remove irrelevant features for improving the results of breast cancer prediction. The results show that feature reduction is useful for improving the predictive accuracy and density is irrelevant feature in the dataset where the data had been identified on full field digital mammograms collected at the Institute of Radiology of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg between 2003 and 2006. In addition, decision tree (DT), support vector machine-sequential minimal optimization (SVM-SMO) and their ensembles were applied to solve the breast cancer diagnostic problem in an attempt to predict results with better performance. The results demonstrate that ensemble classifiers are more accurate than a single classifier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20703679     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-010-9518-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  21 in total

1.  A computer-aided diagnosis system for digital mammograms based on fuzzy-neural and feature extraction techniques.

Authors:  B Verma; J Zakos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2001-03

2.  Long-term survival rates of cancer patients achieved by the end of the 20th century: a period analysis.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods.

Authors:  Dursun Delen; Glenn Walker; Amit Kadam
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Novel network architecture and learning algorithm for the classification of mass abnormalities in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Brijesh Verma
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Do groups of women aged 50 to 75 match the national average mammography rate?

Authors:  W Rakowski; M A Clark
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Mammography benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: a model evaluation.

Authors:  Adriana J Rijnsburger; Gerrit J van Oortmarssen; Rob Boer; Gerrit Draisma; Teresa To; Anthony B Miller; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  A logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mary J Lindstrom; Charles E Kahn; Katherine A Shaffer; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Heidelberg retina tomograph measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Kwokleung Chan; Christopher Bowd; Jicuang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Robert N Weinreb; Terrence J Sejnowski; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  9 in total

1.  Using multidimensional mutual information to prioritize mammographic features for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Wu; D J Vanness; E S Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

2.  Drug design by machine-trained elastic networks: predicting Ser/Thr-protein kinase inhibitors' activities.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahmadi Toussi; Javad Haddadnia; Chérif F Matta
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Construction the model on the breast cancer survival analysis use support vector machine, logistic regression and decision tree.

Authors:  Cheng-Min Chao; Ya-Wen Yu; Bor-Wen Cheng; Yao-Lung Kuo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Applying Data Mining Techniques to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Joana Diz; Goreti Marreiros; Alberto Freitas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Predicting Breast Cancer Based on Optimized Deep Learning Approach.

Authors:  Hager Saleh; Sara F Abd-El Ghany; Hashem Alyami; Wael Alosaimi
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-19

7.  A computational pipeline for the development of multi-marker bio-signature panels and ensemble classifiers.

Authors:  Oliver P Günther; Virginia Chen; Gabriela Cohen Freue; Robert F Balshaw; Scott J Tebbutt; Zsuzsanna Hollander; Mandeep Takhar; W Robert McMaster; Bruce M McManus; Paul A Keown; Raymond T Ng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data.

Authors:  Hossein Yousefi Banaem; Alireza Mehri Dehnavi; Makhtum Shahnazi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Support vector machines for explaining physiological stress response in Wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus).

Authors:  Beatriz Sánchez-González; Isabel Barja; Ana Piñeiro; M Carmen Hernández-González; Gema Silván; Juan Carlos Illera; Roberto Latorre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.