Mingwu Wang1, Ake Tzu-Hui Lu, Rohit Varma, Joel S Schuman, David S Greenfield, David Huang. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ †Doheny Eye Institute and the Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA ‡University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA §Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL ∥Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To improve the diagnosis of glaucoma by combining time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) measurements of the optic disc, circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular retinal thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six age-matched normal and 96 perimetric glaucoma participants were included in this observational, cross-sectional study. Or-logic, support vector machine, relevance vector machine, and linear discrimination function were used to analyze the performances of combined TD-OCT diagnostic variables. RESULTS: The area under the receiver-operating curve (AROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and to compare the diagnostic performance of single and combined anatomic variables. The best RNFL thickness variables were the inferior (AROC=0.900), overall (AROC=0.892), and superior quadrants (AROC=0.850). The best optic disc variables were horizontal integrated rim width (AROC=0.909), vertical integrated rim area (AROC=0.908), and cup/disc vertical ratio (AROC=0.890). All macular retinal thickness variables had AROCs of 0.829 or less. Combining the top 3 RNFL and optic disc variables in optimizing glaucoma diagnosis, support vector machine had the highest AROC, 0.954, followed by or-logic (AROC=0.946), linear discrimination function (AROC=0.946), and relevance vector machine (AROC=0.943). All combination diagnostic variables had significantly larger AROCs than any single diagnostic variable. There are no significant differences among the combination diagnostic indices. CONCLUSIONS: With TD-OCT, RNFL and optic disc variables had better diagnostic accuracy than macular retinal variables. Combining top RNFL and optic disc variables significantly improved diagnostic performance. Clinically, or-logic classification was the most practical analytical tool with sufficient accuracy to diagnose early glaucoma.
PURPOSE: To improve the diagnosis of glaucoma by combining time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) measurements of the optic disc, circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular retinal thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six age-matched normal and 96 perimetric glaucomaparticipants were included in this observational, cross-sectional study. Or-logic, support vector machine, relevance vector machine, and linear discrimination function were used to analyze the performances of combined TD-OCT diagnostic variables. RESULTS: The area under the receiver-operating curve (AROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and to compare the diagnostic performance of single and combined anatomic variables. The best RNFL thickness variables were the inferior (AROC=0.900), overall (AROC=0.892), and superior quadrants (AROC=0.850). The best optic disc variables were horizontal integrated rim width (AROC=0.909), vertical integrated rim area (AROC=0.908), and cup/disc vertical ratio (AROC=0.890). All macular retinal thickness variables had AROCs of 0.829 or less. Combining the top 3 RNFL and optic disc variables in optimizing glaucoma diagnosis, support vector machine had the highest AROC, 0.954, followed by or-logic (AROC=0.946), linear discrimination function (AROC=0.946), and relevance vector machine (AROC=0.943). All combination diagnostic variables had significantly larger AROCs than any single diagnostic variable. There are no significant differences among the combination diagnostic indices. CONCLUSIONS: With TD-OCT, RNFL and optic disc variables had better diagnostic accuracy than macular retinal variables. Combining top RNFL and optic disc variables significantly improved diagnostic performance. Clinically, or-logic classification was the most practical analytical tool with sufficient accuracy to diagnose early glaucoma.
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Roberto M Vessani; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; Jeffrey D Henderer; L Jay Katz; William C Steinmann; George L Spaeth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Zuohua Zhang; Linda M Zangwill; Jiucang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Terrence J Sejnowski; Robert N Weinreb; Michael H Goldbaum Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Henriët Springelkamp; Kyungmoo Lee; Roger C W Wolfs; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Wishal D Ramdas; Albert Hofman; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Michael D Abràmoff; Nomdo M Jansonius Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Huseyin Simavli; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Christian J Que; Yingna Liu; Mustafa Akduman; Edem Tsikata; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Nils A Loewen; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Rohit Varma; David Huang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 4.638