Literature DB >> 22828002

Combining information from 3 anatomic regions in the diagnosis of glaucoma with time-domain optical coherence tomography.

Mingwu Wang1, Ake Tzu-Hui Lu, Rohit Varma, Joel S Schuman, David S Greenfield, David Huang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve the diagnosis of glaucoma by combining time-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) measurements of the optic disc, circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macular retinal thickness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six age-matched normal and 96 perimetric glaucoma participants were included in this observational, cross-sectional study. Or-logic, support vector machine, relevance vector machine, and linear discrimination function were used to analyze the performances of combined TD-OCT diagnostic variables.
RESULTS: The area under the receiver-operating curve (AROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and to compare the diagnostic performance of single and combined anatomic variables. The best RNFL thickness variables were the inferior (AROC=0.900), overall (AROC=0.892), and superior quadrants (AROC=0.850). The best optic disc variables were horizontal integrated rim width (AROC=0.909), vertical integrated rim area (AROC=0.908), and cup/disc vertical ratio (AROC=0.890). All macular retinal thickness variables had AROCs of 0.829 or less. Combining the top 3 RNFL and optic disc variables in optimizing glaucoma diagnosis, support vector machine had the highest AROC, 0.954, followed by or-logic (AROC=0.946), linear discrimination function (AROC=0.946), and relevance vector machine (AROC=0.943). All combination diagnostic variables had significantly larger AROCs than any single diagnostic variable. There are no significant differences among the combination diagnostic indices.
CONCLUSIONS: With TD-OCT, RNFL and optic disc variables had better diagnostic accuracy than macular retinal variables. Combining top RNFL and optic disc variables significantly improved diagnostic performance. Clinically, or-logic classification was the most practical analytical tool with sufficient accuracy to diagnose early glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 22828002      PMCID: PMC3535579          DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318264b941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  45 in total

1.  Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.

Authors:  Annemiek Coops; David Barry Henson; Anna J Kwartz; Paul Habib Artes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Roberto M Vessani; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Optic nerve axon count and axon diameter in patients with ocular hypertension and normal visual fields.

Authors:  F S Mikelberg; H M Yidegiligne; M Schulzer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Anika Michael; Robert T Chang; John McSoley; Joanne Katz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change.

Authors:  Undraa Altangerel; Atilla Bayer; Jeffrey D Henderer; L Jay Katz; William C Steinmann; George L Spaeth
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma.

Authors:  Prashant Naithani; Ramanjit Sihota; Parul Sony; Tanuj Dada; Viney Gupta; Dimple Kondal; Ravindra M Pandey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Relevance vector machine and support vector machine classifier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Felipe A Medeiros; Zuohua Zhang; Linda M Zangwill; Jiucang Hao; Te-Won Lee; Terrence J Sejnowski; Robert N Weinreb; Michael H Goldbaum
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  11 in total

1.  Combining spectral domain optical coherence tomography structural parameters for the diagnosis of glaucoma with early visual field loss.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Regression Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Disc Variables for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Grace M Richter; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; Vikas Chopra; David S Greenfield; Rohit Varma; Joel S Schuman; David Huang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Population-based evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, retinal ganglion cell layer, and inner plexiform layer as a diagnostic tool for glaucoma.

Authors:  Henriët Springelkamp; Kyungmoo Lee; Roger C W Wolfs; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Wishal D Ramdas; Albert Hofman; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Michael D Abràmoff; Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  A new diagnostic model of primary open angle glaucoma based on FD-OCT parameters.

Authors:  Ya-Jie Zheng; Ying-Zi Pan; Xue-Ying Li; Yuan Fang; Mei Li; Rong-Hua Qiao; Yu Cai
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Diagnostic Capability of Peripapillary Retinal Volume Measurements in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Huseyin Simavli; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Christian J Que; Yingna Liu; Mustafa Akduman; Edem Tsikata; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography for detection of early glaucoma and comparison to retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Sara Nowroozizadeh; Nariman Nassiri; Nila Cirineo; Shane Knipping; Joann Giaconi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Vahid Mohammadzadeh; Nima Fatehi; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Ji Woong Lee; Farideh Sharifipour; Ramin Daneshvar; Joseph Caprioli; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis: An evidence based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Kansal; James J Armstrong; Robert Pintwala; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Combining measurements from three anatomical areas for glaucoma diagnosis using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Nils A Loewen; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Biochemical changes and treatment in glaucoma.

Authors:  I M Ciotu; I Stoian; L Gaman; M V Popescu; V Atanasiu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.