Literature DB >> 1531553

Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain.

C G Greenough1, R D Fraser.   

Abstract

The Low-Back Outcome Score has been devised as a new and accurate rating system for patients with low-back pain. Thirteen factors, such as pain, employment, sporting ability, rest required, and activities of daily living, were included; subjective opinion was excluded. Pain and active pursuits were weighted. Presentation of the score as a questionnaire, excluding examination findings, eliminated both interobserver variation and observer variation with time. The score was applied retrospectively in a follow-up study of conservatively treated patients and was found to be more comprehensive and more discriminating than the Oswestry Disability Score, the Waddell Disability Rating, or the Waddell Physical Impairment Rating. The Low-Back Outcome Score is recommended for further evaluation in future prospective studies in low-back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1531553     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  41 in total

Review 1.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Authors:  U Müller; C Roeder; L Dubs; M S Duetz; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Urs Müller; Christoph Röder; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Suhayl I Tafazal; Leslie Ng; Philip Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Johan Bring; Anneli Sjöblom; Karin Sundell; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Outcome scores in spinal surgery quantified: excellent, good, fair and poor in terms of patient-completed tools.

Authors:  Suhayl I Tafazal; Philip J Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers.

Authors:  A Burdorf; B Naaktgeboren; W Post
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients.

Authors:  C Woertgen; M Holzschuh; R D Rothoerl; A Brawanski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T S Keller; M Szpalski; K Vandeputte; R Gunzburg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.