Literature DB >> 16292633

Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Urs Müller1, Christoph Röder, Charles G Greenough.   

Abstract

A literature review of the most widely used condition specific, self administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain had been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects, and available languages were analysed. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. Of similar importance are the content, wording of questions and answers in each of the six questionnaires and an analysis of the different score results. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292633      PMCID: PMC3454553          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  51 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Authors:  U Müller; C Roeder; L Dubs; M S Duetz; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury.

Authors:  S J Bigos; M C Battié; D M Spengler; L D Fisher; W E Fordyce; T H Hansson; A L Nachemson; M D Wortley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Y Hsieh; R B Phillips; A H Adams; M H Pope
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  C G Greenough; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2006.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  Amole Khadilkar; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Lucie Brosseau; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 3.  Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales.

Authors:  Amit Garg; Hardik Pathak; Maxim V Churyukanov; Rajendra B Uppin; Tatyana M Slobodin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice.

Authors:  Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.

Authors:  Martin Björklund; Jern Hamberg; Marina Heiden; Margareta Barnekow-Bergkvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Pain regulation and health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Daniel Briem; Aryan Behechtnejad; Alexander Ouchmaev; Matthias Morfeld; Karin Schermelleh-Engel; Michael Amling; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Primary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessment.

Authors:  Robert Froud; David Ellard; Shilpa Patel; Sandra Eldridge; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.