Literature DB >> 9258635

Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients.

C Woertgen1, M Holzschuh, R D Rothoerl, A Brawanski.   

Abstract

From January to June 1994, we operated conventionally on 121 consecutive hemiated lumbar disc patients as part of a prospective study. We analysed general data, case histories, neurological findings on admission and all data from imaging investigations and therapy. In addition, all patients received a questionnaire based on the Low Back Outcome Score. Most of the patients (93%) were followed-up for 1 year postoperatively in the same manner. On the Prolo Scale, we obtained a good result in 70%; 76% had a good Low Back Outcome Score. Predictive factors are different for different outcome scales. The preoperative duration of pain, the preoperative duration of paresis and smoking seem to be general predictive factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9258635      PMCID: PMC3454614          DOI: 10.1007/bf01301432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Research perspectives in low-back pain. Report of a 1988 workshop.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; S L Gordon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A two-year prospective follow-up study of the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time.

Authors:  L V Sørensen; O Mors
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  J Howe; J W Frymoyer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions.

Authors:  D J Prolo; S A Oklund; M Butcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy.

Authors:  P J Lewis; B K Weir; R W Broad; M G Grace
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies.

Authors:  B K Weir
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  M Hurme; H Alaranta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. I. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects.

Authors:  J Dvorak; M H Gauchat; L Valach
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. II. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects.

Authors:  J Dvorak; L Valach; P Fuhrimann; E Heim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. A prospective clinical study with recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcomes.

Authors:  A Junge; J Dvorak; S Ahrens
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Should smoking habit dictate the fusion technique?

Authors:  A Luca; A F Mannion; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Elfering; R Staerkle; A Junge; D Grob; J Dvorak; N Jacobshagen; N K Semmer; N Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The risk of "getting worse" after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Kristin Sjaavik; Dag Hofoss; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of an unfavorable outcome 1.5 and 12 years after a first, uncomplicated lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Karin Pieber; Nora Salomon; Silke Inschlag; Gabriele Amtmann; Karl-Ludwig Resch; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prognostic factors for non-success in patients with sciatica and disc herniation.

Authors:  Anne Julsrud Haugen; Jens Ivar Brox; Lars Grøvle; Anne Keller; Bård Natvig; Dag Soldal; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Outcome prediction in chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Trond Iversen; Tore K Solberg; Tom Wilsgaard; Knut Waterloo; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  An Outcome Measure of Functionality and Pain in Patients with Low Back Disorder: A Validation Study of the Iranian version of Low Back Outcome Score.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Shazadi; Hamid Khayat Kashany; Hassan Reza Mohammadi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

8.  The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Donatella Prosperi; Marco Boschi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.