Literature DB >> 15029488

Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

U Müller1, M S Duetz, C Roeder, C G Greenough.   

Abstract

A literature review of the nine most widely used, condition-specific, self-administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain has been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects and available languages were analysed for the nine most-used outcome tools. When considering which condition-specific measure to employ, the present overview on assessment tools should provide the necessary information to define the technical aspects of the nine questionnaires. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. In part II the construction of these scales in relationship to the measurement domains will be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15029488      PMCID: PMC3468051          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0665-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  58 in total

1.  Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures.

Authors:  M R Underwood; A G Barnett; M R Vickers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding.

Authors:  L J CRONBACH; W G WARRINGTON
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings.

Authors:  C E Dionne; T D Koepsell; M Von Korff; R A Deyo; W E Barlow; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

6.  [Measuring functional capacity in backache patients in rehabilitation: a comparison of standardized questionnaires].

Authors:  I Roese; T Kohlmann; H Raspe
Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.113

7.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire--Brazil Roland-Morris.

Authors:  L Nusbaum; J Natour; M B Ferraz; J Goldenberg
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.590

8.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain.

Authors:  M Grönblad; E Järvinen; H Hurri; M Hupli; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.

Authors:  J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; M Abrahamowicz; L Abenhaim; S Wood-Dauphinee; D L Lamping; J I Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Urs Müller; Christoph Röder; Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Junge; J C T Fairbank; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Responder analyses in randomised controlled trials for chronic low back pain: an overview of currently used methods.

Authors:  Nicholas Henschke; Annefloor van Enst; Robert Froud; Raymond W G Ostelo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale.

Authors:  Tamás Valasek; Peter Paul Varga; Zsolt Szövérfi; Michelle Kümin; Jeremy Fairbank; Aron Lazary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Extending conceptual frameworks: life course epidemiology for the study of back pain.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire.

Authors:  M J H McCarthy; M P Grevitt; P Silcocks; G Hobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.