Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

Literature DB >> 15029489

Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part II: scale construction.

U Müller¹, C Roeder, L Dubs, M S Duetz, C G Greenough.

Abstract

A literature review of the most widely used, condition-specific, self-administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain has been undertaken. In part I, technical issues such as validity, reliability, availability and comparability were analyzed for the nine most widely used outcome tools. This second part focuses on the content and wording of questions and answers in each of the nine questionnaires, and an analysis of the different score results is performed. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15029489 PMCID： PMC3468046 DOI： 10.1007/s00586-003-0666-0

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Spine J ISSN： 0940-6719 Impact factor: 3.134

22 in total

1. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.

Authors: G Stucki; A Cieza; T Ewert; N Kostanjsek; S Chatterji; T Bedirhan Ustün
Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 3.033

2. The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Authors: Marguerite Schneidert; Rachel Hurst; Janice Miller; Bedirhan Ustün
Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2003 Jun 3-17 Impact factor: 3.033

Review 3. EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors: R Brooks
Journal: Health Policy Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 2.980

4. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors: J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal: Med Care Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 2.983

5. Theorie und Erfahrung in der Medizin: Orthodoxe Wissenschaft und ganzheitliche Kybernetik.

Authors:
Journal: Forsch Komplementarmed Date: 1998

6. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests.

Authors: L H Daltroy; W L Cats-Baril; J N Katz; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1996-03-15 Impact factor: 3.468

7. Assessment of severity in low-back disorders.

Authors: G Waddell; C J Main
Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1984-03 Impact factor: 3.468

8. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors: M Roland; R Morris
Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1983-03 Impact factor: 3.468

9. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties.

Authors: J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; M Abrahamowicz; L Abenhaim; S Wood-Dauphinee; D L Lamping; J I Williams
Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468

10. Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors: A van Tubergen; R Landewé; L Heuft-Dorenbosch; A Spoorenberg; D van der Heijde; H van der Tempel; S van der Linden
Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 19.103

12 in total

Review 1. Back related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors: Urs Müller; Christoph Röder; Charles G Greenough
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2. The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004.

Authors: Robert C Mulholland
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3. Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors: Achim Elfering
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4. Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors: Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 3.134

5. Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.

Authors: Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-05-31 Impact factor: 3.134

6. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.

Authors: Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-05-31 Impact factor: 3.134

7. Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale.

Authors: Tamás Valasek; Peter Paul Varga; Zsolt Szövérfi; Michelle Kümin; Jeremy Fairbank; Aron Lazary
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.134

8. The assessment of symptoms and functional limitations in low back pain patients: validity and reliability of a new questionnaire.

Authors: Martin Björklund; Jern Hamberg; Marina Heiden; Margareta Barnekow-Bergkvist
Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 3.134

9. Real-World Massage Therapy Produces Meaningful Effectiveness Signal for Primary Care Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Results of a Repeated Measures Cohort Study.

Authors: William G Elder; Niki Munk; Margaret M Love; Geza G Bruckner; Kathryn E Stewart; Kevin Pearce
Journal: Pain Med Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 3.750

10. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.

Authors: Henrik H Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 2.362