Literature DB >> 16865379

Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Suhayl I Tafazal1, Leslie Ng, Philip Sell.   

Abstract

This is a double blind randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The trial compared the outcome of salmon calcitonin nasal spray to placebo nasal spray in patients with MRI confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the commonest conditions encountered by spine surgeons. It more frequently affects elderly patients and lumbar decompression has been used to treat the condition with variable success. Non operative measures have been investigated, but their success ranges from 15% to 43% in patients followed up for 1-5 years (Simotas in Clin Orthop 1(384):153-161, 2001). Salmon calcitonin injections have been investigated in previous trials and may have a treatment effect. Nasal salmon calcitonin has become available and if effective would have advantages over injections. Forty patients with symptoms of neurogenic claudication and MRI proven lumbar spinal stenosis were randomly assigned either nasal salmon calcitonin or placebo nasal spray to use for 4 weeks. This was followed by a 'washout' period of 6 weeks, and subsequent treatment with 6 weeks of nasal salmon calcitonin. Standard spine outcome measures including Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score, visual analogue score and shuttle walking test were administered at baseline, 4, 10 and 16 weeks. Twenty patients received nasal salmon calcitonin and twenty patients received placebo nasal spray. At 4 weeks post treatment there was no statistically significant difference in the outcome measures between the two groups. The change in ODI was a mean 1.3 points for the calcitonin group and 0.6 points for the placebo group (P = 0.51), the mean change in visual analogue score for leg pain was 10 mm in the calcitonin group and 0 mm in the placebo group (P = 0.51). There was no significant difference in walking distance between the two groups, with a mean improvement in walking distance of 21 m in the calcitonin group and 8 m in the placebo group (P = 0.78). At the end of the trial the ODI had improved by a mean of 3.7 points in the calcitonin group and 3.8 points in the placebo group (P = 0.44). This randomised placebo controlled trial has not shown any treatment effect in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with nasal salmon calcitonin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16865379      PMCID: PMC2200683          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0154-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effectiveness of salmon calcitonin nasal spray in the treatment of lumbar canal stenosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; Allen M Segal; Michael Lieber; Daniel J Mazanec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Roland K Pratt; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Andrew Virr
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A C Simotas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Calcitonin for pseudoclaudication in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J Streifler; R Hering; N Gadoth
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Spinal cord dysfunction in Paget's disease of bone. Has medical treatment a vascular basis?

Authors:  D L Douglas; T Duckworth; J A Kanis; A A Jefferson; T J Martin; R G Russell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981

7.  Paget's disease. Reversal of severe paraparesis using calcitonin.

Authors:  L A Walpin; F R Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Calcitonin treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical observations.

Authors:  A Eskola; H Alaranta; T Pohjolainen; J Soini; K Tallroth; P Slätis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Calcitonin treatment for neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  R W Porter; C Hibbert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Neurogenic claudication and root claudication treated with calcitonin. A double-blind trial.

Authors:  R W Porter; C G Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  15 in total

1.  Investigating non-operative treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; Mazanec Daniel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

Review 5.  What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Michael Schneider; Y Raja Rampersaud; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 7.  Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steve J Atlas; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  To Assess Whether Lee's Grading System for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Can Be Used as a Decision-Making Tool for Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Do Yeon Ahn; Hee Jin Park; Jung Woo Yi; Ji Na Kim
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-11-04

Review 10.  Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Simon Roner; Ralph Gnannt; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.