Literature DB >> 9816384

Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers.

A Burdorf1, B Naaktgeboren, W Post.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse factors that determine the occurrence of sickness absence due to musculoskeletal problems and the time it takes to return to work.
METHODS: A longitudinal study with two year follow up was conducted among 283 male welders and metal workers. The survey started with a standardised interview on the occurrence of musculoskeletal complaints. 61 (22%) workers were lost to follow up. Data on sickness absence among 222 workers during the follow up were collected from absence records and self reports. Regression analysis based on proportional hazards models was applied to identify risk factors for the occurrence and duration of sickness absence due to various musculoskeletal complaints.
RESULTS: During the follow up 51% of the workers attributed at least one period of sickness absence to musculoskeletal complaints which accounted for 44% of all work days lost. A history of back pain was not associated with sickness absence for back pain, partly because subjects with back pain were more likely to be lost to follow up. Neck or shoulder pain and pain of the upper extremities contributed significantly to neck or shoulder absence (relative risk (RR) 3.35; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.73 to 6.47) and to upper extremities absence (RR 2.29; 95% CI 1.17 to 4.46), respectively. Company and job title were also significant predictors for sickness absence due to these musculoskeletal complaints. Absence with musculoskeletal complaints was not associated with age, height, body mass index, smoking, and duration of employment. Return to work after neck or shoulder absence was worse among metal workers than welders (RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.08 to 4.17). Return to work after lower extremities absence was strongly influenced by visiting a physician (RR 11.31; 95% CI 2.94 to 43.46) and by musculoskeletal comorbidity (RR 2.81; 95% CI 1.18 to 6.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Complaints of the neck or shoulder and upper extremities in the 12 months before the study were associated with sickness absence for these complaints during the follow up. Workers with absence due to pain from back, neck or shoulder, upper extremities, or lower extremities were at higher risk of subsequent sickness absence in the next year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9816384      PMCID: PMC1757615          DOI: 10.1136/oem.55.7.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  24 in total

1.  Hands up or back to work--future challenges in epidemiologic research on musculoskeletal diseases.

Authors:  H Riihimäki
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain.

Authors:  C Infante-Rivard; M Lortie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Methodological challenges to the study of occupational injury--an international epidemiology workshop.

Authors:  T K Courtney; A Burdorf; G S Sorock; R F Herrick
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Challenges in assessing risk factors in epidemiologic studies on back disorders.

Authors:  A Burdorf; M Rossignol; F A Fathallah; S H Snook; R F Herrick
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Comparison of spinal health indicators in predicting spinal status in a 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  M Rossignol; M Lortie; E Ledoux
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Studying the natural history of back pain.

Authors:  M Von Korff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury.

Authors:  R G Hazard; L D Haugh; S Reid; J B Preble; L MacDonald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. III. Medical service--work consequence.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

9.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26

10.  Risk of recurrence of occupational back pain over three year follow up.

Authors:  L Abenhaim; S Suissa; M Rossignol
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-12
View more
  25 in total

1.  Impact of musculoskeletal co-morbidity of neck and upper extremities on healthcare utilisation and sickness absence for low back pain.

Authors:  W IJzelenberg; A Burdorf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Work, a prognosis factor for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders?

Authors:  A Descatha; Y Roquelaure; J-F Chastang; B Evanoff; D Cyr; A Leclerc
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Physical risk factors for developing non-specific neck pain in office workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deokhoon Jun; Michaleff Zoe; Venerina Johnston; Shaun O'Leary
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Job experience, work load, and risk of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  M Häkkänen; E Viikari-Juntura; R Martikainen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Data equivalency of an interactive voice response system for home assessment of back pain and function.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Santosh K Verma
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in sick-listed patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized, controlled trial with one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Eline M Meijer; Judith K Sluiter; Arjan Heyma; Klarita Sadiraj; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulders in female sewing machine operators: prevalence, incidence, and prognosis.

Authors:  A Kaergaard; J H Andersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Pressure pain sensitivity maps, self-reported musculoskeletal disorders and sickness absence among cleaners.

Authors:  Asbjørn Thalund Binderup; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Epidemiological study to investigate potential interaction between physical and psychosocial factors at work that may increase the risk of symptoms of musculoskeletal disorder of the neck and upper limb.

Authors:  J J Devereux; I G Vlachonikolis; P W Buckle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.