Literature DB >> 18592314

Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information.

C Prieto1, E Vano, J I Ten, J M Fernandez, A I Iñiguez, N Arevalo, A Litcheva, E Crespo, A Floriano, D Martinez.   

Abstract

A methodology to automatically detect potential retakes in digital imaging, using the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header information, is presented. In our hospital, neither the computed radiography workstations nor the picture archiving and communication system itself are designed to support reject analysis. A system called QCOnline, initially developed to help in the management of images and patient doses in a digital radiology department, has been used to identify those images with the same patient identification number, same modality, description, projection, date, cassette orientation, and image comments. The pilot experience lead to 6.6% and 1.9% repetition rates for abdomen and chest images. A thorough analysis has shown that the real repetitions were 3.3% and 0.9% for abdomen and chest images being the main cause of the discrepancy being the wrong image identification. The presented methodology to automatically detect potential retakes in digital imaging using DICOM header information is feasible and allows to detect deficiencies in the department performance like wrong identifications, positioning errors, wrong radiographic technique, bad image processing, equipment malfunctions, artefacts, etc. In addition, retake images automatically collected can be used for continuous training of the staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18592314      PMCID: PMC3043704          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9135-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  S Peer; R Peer; M Walcher; M Pohl; W Jaschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  S Peer; R Peer; S M Giacomuzzi; W Jaschke
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2004

4.  Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.

Authors:  J Nol; G Isouard; J Mirecki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Reject analysis: a pilot programme for image quality management.

Authors:  T N Arvanitis; P M Parizel; H R Degryse; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Continuing reject-repeat film analysis program.

Authors:  G Gadeholt; J T Geitung; J H Göthlin; T Asp
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.

Authors:  M Freedman; D Steller; H Jafroudi; S K Mun
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Is reject analysis necessary after converting to computed radiography?

Authors:  Rosemary Honea; Maria Elissa Blado; Yinlin Ma
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.

Authors:  E Vano; J M Fernandez; J I Ten; L Gonzalez; E Guibelalde; C Prieto
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  The DIMOND project and its impact on radiation protection.

Authors:  K Faulkner
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; William Pavlicek; Catherine C Roberts; Steve G Langer; Muhong Zhang; Mengqi Hu; Richard L Morin; Beth A Schueler; Clinton V Wellnitz; Teresa Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Investigation of the variability in the assessment of digital chest X-ray image quality.

Authors:  Jacquelyn S Whaley; Barry D Pressman; Jonathan R Wilson; Lionel Bravo; William J Sehnert; David H Foos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Managing repeat digital radiography images-a systematic approach and improvement.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Tzeng; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Chung-Feng Liu; Huan-Chung Yao; Chin-Yu Chen; Huang-Wei Lin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Raimund Polman; Charles E Willis; S Jeff Shepard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study.

Authors:  Samantha Atkinson; Michael Neep; Deborah Starkey
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-07-18

6.  Image rejects in general direct digital radiography.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Tine Blomberg Rosanowsky; Camilla Jensen; Kenneth Hong Ching Wah
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-10-08

7.  Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.

Authors:  Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof; Nur Liyana Abdul Rahman; Amiza Aqiela Ahmad Asri; Noor Ilyani Othman; Ilham Wan Mokhtar
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-12-12

8.  Visualizing the Invisible: Invisible Waste in Diagnostic Imaging.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann; Eivind Richter Andersen; Elin Kjelle
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.