Literature DB >> 17704316

Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

T Svahn1, B Hemdal, M Ruschin, D P Chakraborty, I Andersson, A Tingberg, S Mattsson.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of dose reduction on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography. Simulated masses and microcalcifications were positioned in an anthropomorphic breast phantom. Thirty digital images, 14 with lesions, 16 without, were acquired of the phantom using a Mammomat Novation (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at each of three dose levels. These corresponded to 100%, 50% and 30% of the normally used average glandular dose (AGD; 1.3 mGy for a standard breast). Eight observers interpreted the 90 unprocessed images in a free response study, and the data were analysed with the jackknife free response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) method. Observer performance was assessed using the JAFROC figure of merit (FOM). The benefit of radiation risk reduction was estimated based on several risk models. There was no statistically significant difference in performance, as described by the FOM, between the 100% and the 50% dose levels. However, the FOMs for both the 100% and the 50% dose were significantly different from the corresponding quantity for the 30% dose level (F-statistic = 4.95, p-value = 0.01). A dose reduction of 50% would result in three to nine fewer breast cancer fatalities per 100,000 women undergoing annual screening from the age of 40 to 49 years. The results of the study indicate a possibility of reducing the dose to the breast to half the dose level currently used. This has to be confirmed in clinical studies, and possible differences depending on lesion type should be examined further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704316      PMCID: PMC2253655          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/29933797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.

Authors:  S Kheddache; A Thilander-Klang; B Lanhede; L G Månsson; N Bjurstam; P Ackerholm; L Björneld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2004

3.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Philipp Bernhardt; Thomas Mertelmeier; Martin Hoheisel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1996

6.  Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates.

Authors:  C A Roe; C E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials.

Authors:  Lennarth Nyström; Ingvar Andersson; Nils Bjurstam; Jan Frisell; Bo Nordenskjöld; Lars Erik Rutqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program.

Authors:  I Andersson; L Janzon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

9.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Ming-Fang Yen; Bedrich Vitak; Hsiu-Hsi Tony Chen; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Paola Baldelli; Angelo Taibi; Cosimo Di Maggio; Mauro Gambaccini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of dose reduction on the ability of digital mammography to detect simulated microcalcifications.

Authors:  Mari Yakabe; Shuji Sakai; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Takeshi Kamitani; Taro Setoguchi; Mayumi Cho; Masafumi Masuda; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  S S Shim; Y-W Oh; K A Kong; Y J Ryu; Y Kim; D H Jang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The potential use of ultra-low radiation dose images in digital mammography--a clinical proof-of-concept study in craniocaudal views.

Authors:  A M J Bluekens; W J H Veldkamp; K H Schuur; N Karssemeijer; M J M Broeders; G J den Heeten
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Digital Mammography by Deep-Learning Algorithm Image Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Su Min Ha; Hak Hee Kim; Eunhee Kang; Bo Kyoung Seo; Nami Choi; Tae Hee Kim; You Jin Ku; Jong Chul Ye
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.