Literature DB >> 15741599

No relationship between sequence variation in protein coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene and saccharin preference in rats.

Ke Lu1, Amanda H McDaniel, Michael G Tordoff, Xia Li, Gary K Beauchamp, Alexander A Bachmanov, Dennis A VanderWeele, Clinton D Chapman, Nancy K Dess, Liquan Huang, Hong Wang, Danielle R Reed.   

Abstract

Nearly all mammalian species like sweet-tasting foods and drinks, but there are differences in the degree of 'sweet tooth' both between species and among individuals of the same species. Some individual differences can be explained by genetic variability. Polymorphisms in a sweet taste receptor (Tas1r3) account for a large fraction of the differences in consumption of sweet solutions among inbred mouse strains. We wondered whether mice and rats share the same Tas1r3 alleles, and whether this gene might explain the large difference in saccharin preference among rats. We conducted three experiments to test this. We examined DNA sequence differences in the Tas1r3 gene among rats that differed in their consumption of saccharin in two-bottle choice tests. The animals tested were from an outbred strain (Sprague-Dawley; experiment 1), selectively bred to be high- or low-saccharin consumers (HiS and LoS; experiment 2), or from inbred strains with established differences in saccharin preference (FH/Wjd and ACI; experiment 3). Although there was considerable variation in saccharin preference among the rats there was no variation in the protein-coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene. DNA variants in intronic regions were detected in 1 (of 12) outbred rat with lower-than-average saccharin preference and in the ACI inbred strain, which also has a lower saccharin preference than the FH/Wjd inbred partner strain. Possible effects of these intronic nucleotide variants on Tas1r3 gene expression or the presence of T1R3 protein in taste papillae were evaluated in the ACI and FH/Wjd strains. Based upon the results of these studies, we conclude that polymorphisms in the protein-coding regions of the sweet receptor gene Tas1r3 are uncommon and do not account for individual differences in saccharin preference for these strains of rats. DNA variants in intron 4 and 5 are more common but appear to be innocuous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741599      PMCID: PMC1400602          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  37 in total

1.  Ggamma13 colocalizes with gustducin in taste receptor cells and mediates IP3 responses to bitter denatonium.

Authors:  L Huang; Y G Shanker; J Dubauskaite; J Z Zheng; W Yan; S Rosenzweig; A I Spielman; M Max; R F Margolskee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

3.  Pleiotropic effect of a locus on chromosome 4 influencing alcohol drinking and emotional reactivity in rats.

Authors:  E Terenina-Rigaldie; B C Jones; P Mormède
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  The relationship between saccharin and alcohol intake in rats.

Authors:  B A Gosnell; D D Krahn
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Molecular genetic identification of a candidate receptor gene for sweet taste.

Authors:  M Kitagawa; Y Kusakabe; H Miura; Y Ninomiya; A Hino
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of the Indiana University rat lines selectively bred for high and low alcohol preference.

Authors:  James M Murphy; Robert B Stewart; Richard L Bell; Nancy E Badia-Elder; Lucinda G Carr; William J McBride; Lawrence Lumeng; Ting-Kai Li
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Human facial expressions in response to taste and smell stimulation.

Authors:  J E Steiner
Journal:  Adv Child Dev Behav       Date:  1979

8.  Association between preference for sweets and excessive alcohol intake: a review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  A B Kampov-Polevoy; J C Garbutt; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.826

9.  Saccharin intake predicts ethanol intake in genetically heterogeneous rats as well as different rat strains.

Authors:  D H Overstreet; A B Kampov-Polevoy; A H Rezvani; L Murrelle; J A Halikas; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Richard A Clare
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Cats lack a sweet taste receptor.

Authors:  Xia Li; Weihua Li; Hong Wang; Douglas L Bayley; Jie Cao; Danielle R Reed; Alexander A Bachmanov; Liquan Huang; Véronique Legrand-Defretin; Gary K Beauchamp; Joseph G Brand
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Taste solution consumption by FHH-Chr nBN consomic rats.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Strain differences in the neural, behavioral, and molecular correlates of sweet and salty taste in naive, ethanol- and sucrose-exposed P and NP rats.

Authors:  Jamison Coleman; Ashley Williams; Tam-Hao T Phan; Shobha Mummalaneni; Pamela Melone; Zuojun Ren; Huiping Zhou; Sunila Mahavadi; Karnam S Murthy; Tadayoshi Katsumata; John A DeSimone; Vijay Lyall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

8.  Changes in taste receptor cell [Ca2+]i modulate chorda tympani responses to bitter, sweet, and umami taste stimuli.

Authors:  John A Desimone; Tam-Hao T Phan; Zuojun Ren; Shobha Mummalaneni; Vijay Lyall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Amylin receptor activation in the ventral tegmental area reduces motivated ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Mietlicki-Baase; Lauren E McGrath; Kieran Koch-Laskowski; Joanna Krawczyk; David J Reiner; Tram Pham; Chan Tran N Nguyen; Christopher A Turner; Diana R Olivos; Mathieu E Wimmer; Heath D Schmidt; Matthew R Hayes
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 10.  The taste of sugars.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.