Literature DB >> 15257443

Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity?

Dennis P Bayrock1, W Michael Ingledew.   

Abstract

Lactic acid was added to batch very high gravity (VHG) fermentations and to continuous VHG fermentations equilibrated to steady state with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A 53% reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) ml(-1) of S. cerevisiae was observed in continuous fermentation at an undissociated lactic acid concentration of 3.44% w/v; and greater than 99.9% reduction was evident at 5.35% w/v lactic acid. The differences in yeast cell number in these fermentations were not due to pH, since batch fermentations over a pH range of 2.5-5.0 did not lead to changes in growth rate. Similar fermentations performed in batch showed that growth inhibition with added lactic acid was nearly identical. This indicates that the apparent high resistance of S. cerevisiae to lactic acid in continuous VHG fermentations is not a function of culture mode. Although the total amount of ethanol decreased from 48.7 g l(-1) to 14.5 g l(-1) when 4.74% w/v undissociated lactic acid was added, the specific ethanol productivity increased ca. 3.2-fold (from 7.42 x 10(-7) g to 24.0 x 10(-7) g ethanol CFU(-1) h(-1)), which indicated that lactic acid stress improved the ethanol production of each surviving cell. In multistage continuous fermentations, lactic acid was not responsible for the 83% (CFU ml(-1)) reduction in viable S. cerevisiae yeasts when Lactobacillus paracasei was introduced to the system at a controlled pH of 6.0. The competition for trace nutrients in those fermentations and not lactic acid produced by L. paracasei likely caused the yeast inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257443     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-004-0156-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  14 in total

1.  Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology.

Authors:  D P Bayrock; W Michael Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Modeling of the bacterial growth curve.

Authors:  M H Zwietering; I Jongenburger; F M Rombouts; K van 't Riet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  The proton motive force in bacteria: a critical assessment of methods.

Authors:  E R Kashket
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  D Bayrock; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The antimicrobial effect of dissociated and undissociated sorbic acid at different pH levels.

Authors:  T Eklund
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1983-06

7.  Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  C Verduyn; E Postma; W A Scheffers; J P Van Dijken
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; S H Hynes; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B Maiorella; H W Blanch; C R Wilke
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  10 in total

1.  Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method.

Authors:  Ohana Yonara Assis Costa; Betulia Morais Souto; Daiva Domenech Tupinambá; Jessica Carvalho Bergmann; Cynthia Maria Kyaw; Ricardo Henrique Kruger; Cristine Chaves Barreto; Betania Ferraz Quirino
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.

Authors:  Tara Graves; Neelakantam V Narendranath; Karl Dawson; Ronan Power
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Enforced Mutualism Leads to Improved Cooperative Behavior between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  S Christine du Toit; Debra Rossouw; Maret du Toit; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-07-24

6.  Understanding the Biosynthetic Changes that Give Origin to the Distinctive Flavor of Sotol: Microbial Identification and Analysis of the Volatile Metabolites Profiles During Sotol (Dasylirion sp.) Must Fermentation.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Zavala-Díaz de la Serna; Ricardo Contreras-López; L Paola Lerma-Torres; Francisco Ruiz-Terán; Beatriz A Rocha-Gutiérrez; Samuel B Pérez-Vega; Leslie R Elías-Ogaz; Ivan Salmerón
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-07-16

Review 7.  Lactic Acid Bacteria as Biopreservation Against Spoilage Molds in Dairy Products - A Review.

Authors:  Ce Shi; Maryam Maktabdar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Developing a reproducible protocol for culturing functional confluent monolayers of differentiated equine oviduct epithelial cells†.

Authors:  Bart Leemans; Elizabeth G Bromfield; Tom A E Stout; Mabel Vos; Hanna Van Der Ham; Ramada Van Beek; Ann Van Soom; Bart M Gadella; Heiko Henning
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.161

9.  An organic acid-tolerant HAA1-overexpression mutant of an industrial bioethanol strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its application to the production of bioethanol from sugarcane molasses.

Authors:  Takuya Inaba; Daisuke Watanabe; Yoko Yoshiyama; Koichi Tanaka; Jun Ogawa; Hiroshi Takagi; Hitoshi Shimoi; Jun Shima
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Exploring the evolution of multicellularity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under bacteria environment: An experimental phylogenetics approach.

Authors:  Julian F Quintero-Galvis; Rocío Paleo-López; Jaiber J Solano-Iguaran; María Josefina Poupin; Thomas Ledger; Juan Diego Gaitan-Espitia; Andrzej Antoł; Michael Travisano; Roberto F Nespolo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.