Literature DB >> 16491359

Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.

Tara Graves1, Neelakantam V Narendranath, Karl Dawson, Ronan Power.   

Abstract

The effects of lactic and acetic acids on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash, as influenced by pH and dissolved solids concentration, were examined. The lactic and acetic acid concentrations utilized were 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0% w/v, and 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6% w/v, respectively. Corn mashes (20, 25 and 30% dry solids) were adjusted to the following pH levels after lactic or acetic acid addition: 4.0, 4.5, 5.0 or 5.5 prior to yeast inoculation. Lactic acid did not completely inhibit ethanol production by the yeast. However, lactic acid at 4% w/v decreased (P<0.05) final ethanol concentration in all mashes at all pH levels. In 30% solids mash set at pH < or =5, lactic acid at 3% w/v reduced (P<0.05) ethanol production. In contrast, inhibition by acetic acid increased as the concentration of solids in the mash increased and the pH of the medium declined. Ethanol production was completely inhibited in all mashes set at pH 4 in the presence of acetic acid at concentrations > or =0.8% w/v. In 30% solids mash set at pH 4, final ethanol levels decreased (P<0.01) with only 0.1% w/v acetic acid. These results suggest that the inhibitory effects of lactic acid and acetic acid on ethanol production in corn mash fermentation when set at a pH of 5.0-5.5 are not as great as that reported thus far using laboratory media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491359     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-006-0091-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  13 in total

1.  Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M E Pampulha; M C Loureiro-Dias
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts.

Authors:  E Palmqvist; H Grage; N Q Meinander; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1999-04-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives.

Authors:  Peter Piper; Claudia Ortiz Calderon; Kostas Hatzixanthis; Mehdi Mollapour
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Buffering capacity of whole corn mash alters concentrations of organic acids required to inhibit growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ethanol production.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.461

6.  Modification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae thermotolerance following rapid exposure to acid stress.

Authors:  V Carmelo; R Santos; C A Viegas; I Sá-Correia
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  A Garay-Arroyo; A A Covarrubias; I Clark; I Niño; G Gosset; A Martinez
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Lactic acid tolerance determined by measurement of intracellular pH of single cells of Candida krusei and Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolated from fermented maize dough.

Authors:  M Halm; T Hornbaek; N Arneborg; S Sefa-Dedeh; L Jespersen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Effects of particulate materials and osmoprotectants on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of fermentation kinetics of acid-treated corn cob hydrolysate for xylose fermentation in the presence of acetic acid by Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Mohan Kashid; Anand Ghosalkar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes.

Authors:  E Tomás-Pejó; M Ballesteros; J M Oliva; L Olsson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Drug resistance marker-aided genome shuffling to improve acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dao-Qiong Zheng; Xue-Chang Wu; Pin-Mei Wang; Xiao-Qin Chi; Xiang-Lin Tao; Ping Li; Xin-Hang Jiang; Yu-Hua Zhao
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Interaction of 4-ethylphenol, pH, sucrose and ethanol on the growth and fermentation capacity of the industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PE-2.

Authors:  Elizabete A Covre; Lincon F L Silva; Reinaldo G Bastos; Sandra R Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Physiological and transcriptional responses to high concentrations of lactic acid in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; Erwin Suir; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Improved Acetic Acid Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Overexpression of the WHI2 Gene Identified through Inverse Metabolic Engineering.

Authors:  Yingying Chen; Lisa Stabryla; Na Wei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Integrating sugarcane molasses into sequential cellulosic biofuel production based on SSF process of high solid loading.

Authors:  Meishan Fan; Shuaishuai Zhang; Guangying Ye; Hongdan Zhang; Jun Xie
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Dual sensor measurement shows that temperature outperforms pH as an early sign of aerobic deterioration in maize silage.

Authors:  Guilin Shan; Yurui Sun; Wolfgang Buescher; Christian Maack; André Lipski; Ismail-Hakki Acir; Manfred Trimborn; Fabian Kuellmer; Ye Wang; David A Grantz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of alcohol compounds on the growth and lipid accumulation of oleaginous yeast Trichosporon fermentans.

Authors:  Chao Huang; Hong Wu; Li-ping Liu; Wen-yong Lou; Min-hua Zong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of assimilable nitrogen availability in glucose uptake kinetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Margarida Palma; Sara Cordeiro Madeira; Ana Mendes-Ferreira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.