Literature DB >> 26381538

Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Qing Li1,2, E Patrick Heist3, Luke A Moe4.   

Abstract

Corn-based fuel ethanol facilities mix enzymatically treated, gelatinized corn starch with water to generate a "mash" that is used as the substrate in large-scale (∼500,000 gallon) yeast-based fermentations. In contrast to other food and beverage fermentations (e.g., cheese, wine), bioethanol production is presumed to be optimal when bacteria are absent from the fermentation-thus maximizing conversion of glucose to ethanol-yet the facilities are not sterilized. Culture-based analysis has suggested that lactic acid bacteria occupy this niche and, under certain circumstances, can outcompete the dedicated fermentation yeast for nutrients. Here, we use 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to probe bacterial community structure during bioethanol fermentation. Nineteen total batches from five corn-based fuel ethanol fermentation facilities were analyzed. From each batch, five samples were taken. This includes the contents of the yeast propagation tank at inoculation, three samples taken at intervals during the fermentation, and a sample taken at the end of fermentation. Bacterial community structure was compared with time, between facility, between fermentor, between batches from the same fermentor, and against environmental variables within each fermentation. Communities were dominated by members of the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla, with lactic acid bacteria dominating the communities in two of the five facilities. In the other facilities, Proteobacteria (largely members of the Pseudomonas and Escherichia-Shigella genera) outcompete the lactic acid bacteria. In most cases, the yeast propagation tank inoculum imparted a rich bacterial community, but the batches vary regarding whether this inoculum was the primary driver of the fermentation community structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial ecology; Bioethanol; Biofuel; Fermentation; Lactic acid bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26381538     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-015-0673-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  17 in total

1.  Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform.

Authors:  James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  DGGE and real-time PCR analysis of lactic acid bacteria in bacterial communities of the phyllosphere of lettuce.

Authors:  Jutta Zwielehner; Michael Handschur; Astrid Michaelsen; Selen Irez; Michael Demel; Ewald B M Denner; Alexander G Haslberger
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.914

3.  Differentiation of mixed lactic acid bacteria communities in beverage fermentations using targeted terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; David A Mills
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  Antibiotic resistance among cultured bacterial isolates from bioethanol fermentation facilities across the United States.

Authors:  Colin A Murphree; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 5.  Microbial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  M Beckner; M L Ivey; T G Phister
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus species isolated from commercial ethanol plants.

Authors:  Kenneth M Bischoff; Kelly A Skinner-Nemec; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; John H Thorngate; Paul M Richardson; David A Mills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes in Zea across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology.

Authors:  David Johnston-Monje; Manish N Raizada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar; Brian J Haas; Jose C Clemente; Christopher Quince; Rob Knight
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Assessing the impact of corn variety and Texas terroir on flavor and alcohol yield in new-make bourbon whiskey.

Authors:  Robert J Arnold; Alejandra Ochoa; Chris R Kerth; Rhonda K Miller; Seth C Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Complex yeast-bacteria interactions affect the yield of industrial ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Felipe Senne de Oliveira Lino; Djordje Bajic; Jean Celestin Charles Vila; Alvaro Sánchez; Morten Otto Alexander Sommer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.