Literature DB >> 18548541

By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

B Maiorella1, H W Blanch, C R Wilke.   

Abstract

Inhibition by secondary fermentation products may limit the ultimate productivity of new glucose to ethanol fermentation processes. New processes are under development whereby ethanol is selectively removed from the fermenting broth to eliminate ethanol inhibition effects. These processes can concentrate minor secondary products to the point where they become toxic to the yeast. Vacuum fermentation selectively concentrates nonvolatile products in the fermentation broth. Membrane fermentation systems may concentrate large molecules which are sterically blocked from membrane transport. Extractive fermentation systems, employing nonpolar solvents, may concentrate small organic acids. By-product production rates and inhibition levels in continuous fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been determined for acetaldehyde, glycerol, formic, lactic, and acetic acids, 1-propanol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and 2,3-butanediol to assess the potential effects of these by-products on new fermentation processes. Mechanisms are proposed for the various inhibition effects observed.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 18548541     DOI: 10.1002/bit.260250109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  34 in total

1.  The H(+)-ATPase in the plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is activated during growth latency in octanoic acid-supplemented medium accompanying the decrease in intracellular pH and cell viability.

Authors:  C A Viegas; P F Almeida; M Cavaco; I Sá-Correia
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of fermentation kinetics of acid-treated corn cob hydrolysate for xylose fermentation in the presence of acetic acid by Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Mohan Kashid; Anand Ghosalkar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Measurement of the effects of acetic acid and extracellular pH on intracellular pH of nonfermenting, individual Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells by fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  L U Guldfeldt; N Arneborg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of yeast inoculation rate on the metabolism of contaminating lactobacilli during fermentation of corn mash.

Authors:  Neelakantam V Narendranath; Ronan Power
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Casein Kinase I Isoform Hrr25 Is a Negative Regulator of Haa1 in the Weak Acid Stress Response Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Morgan E Collins; Joshua J Black; Zhengchang Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity?

Authors:  Dennis P Bayrock; W Michael Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 8.  Physiology of yeasts in relation to biomass yields.

Authors:  C Verduyn
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1991 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Evaluation of bacterial contamination in a fed-batch alcoholic fermentation process.

Authors:  P de Oliva-Neto; F Yokoya
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Carnitine and carnitine acetyltransferases in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for carnitine in stress protection.

Authors:  Jaco Franken; Sven Kroppenstedt; Jan H Swiegers; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.