Literature DB >> 11420658

Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium.

N V Narendranath1, K C Thomas, W M Ingledew.   

Abstract

Specific growth rates (mu) of two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae decreased exponentially (R2 > 0.9) as the concentrations of acetic acid or lactic acid were increased in minimal media at 30 degrees C. Moreover, the length of the lag phase of each growth curve (h) increased exponentially as increasing concentrations of acetic or lactic acid were added to the media. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of acetic acid for yeast growth was 0.6% w/v (100 mM) and that of lactic acid was 2.5% w/v (278 mM) for both strains of yeast. However, acetic acid at concentrations as low as 0.05-0.1% w/v and lactic acid at concentrations of 0.2-0.8% w/v begin to stress the yeasts as seen by reduced growth rates and decreased rates of glucose consumption and ethanol production as the concentration of acetic or lactic acid in the media was raised. In the presence of increasing acetic acid, all the glucose in the medium was eventually consumed even though the rates of consumption differed. However, this was not observed in the presence of increasing lactic acid where glucose consumption was extremely protracted even at a concentration of 0.6% w/v (66 mM). A response surface central composite design was used to evaluate the interaction between acetic and lactic acids on the specific growth rate of both yeast strains at 30 degrees C. The data were analysed using the General Linear Models (GLM) procedure. From the analysis, the interaction between acetic acid and lactic acid was statistically significant (P < or = 0.001), i.e., the inhibitory effect of the two acids present together in a medium is highly synergistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420658     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  51 in total

1.  Quantitative mass spectrometry-based multiplexing compares the abundance of 5000 S. cerevisiae proteins across 10 carbon sources.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Jeremy D O'Connell; Robert A Everley; Jonathon O'Brien; Micah A Gygi; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Evaluation of fermentation kinetics of acid-treated corn cob hydrolysate for xylose fermentation in the presence of acetic acid by Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Mohan Kashid; Anand Ghosalkar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Conventional and nonconventional strategies for controlling bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Metabolic responses to Lactobacillus plantarum contamination or bacteriophage treatment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a GC-MS-based metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Feng-Xia Cui; Rui-Min Zhang; Hua-Qing Liu; Yan-Feng Wang; Hao Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity?

Authors:  Dennis P Bayrock; W Michael Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Physiological and transcriptional responses to high concentrations of lactic acid in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; Erwin Suir; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Carnitine and carnitine acetyltransferases in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for carnitine in stress protection.

Authors:  Jaco Franken; Sven Kroppenstedt; Jan H Swiegers; Florian F Bauer
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.

Authors:  Tara Graves; Neelakantam V Narendranath; Karl Dawson; Ronan Power
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.